351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31886914)
1. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of two Postprocessing Methods onto Surface Dimension of in-Office Fabricated Stereolithographic Implant Surgical Guides.
Ammoun R; Dalal N; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan; 30(1):71-75. PubMed ID: 32686246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.
Yeung M; Abdulmajeed A; Carrico CK; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):821-828. PubMed ID: 31653399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Implant Placement Position Using Nondental Open-Source Software: An In Vitro Study.
Talmazov G; Bencharit S; Waldrop TC; Ammoun R
J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 29(7):604-610. PubMed ID: 32495453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Implants Placed with Surgical Guides: Thermoplastic Versus 3D Printed.
Bell CK; Sahl EF; Kim YJ; Rice DD
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(1):113-119. PubMed ID: 29240212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-Printed Implant Sliding Guide: A New Dental Implant Surgical Guide.
Al Kabany MH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Oct; 38(5):874-884. PubMed ID: 37847829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing.
Yu BY; Son K; Lee KB
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Aug; 126(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 32807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Sun Y; Ding Q; Yuan F; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Oct; 33(10):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35852859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of virtually planned and 3D-printed stereolithographic surgical guides from CBCT and digital scans: An in vitro study.
Shah NP; Khanna A; Pai AR; Sheth VH; Raut SR
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 33583616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods.
Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study.
Adams CR; Ammoun R; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan; 32(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 35257456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.
Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers?
Deeb GR; Allen RK; Hall VP; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Bencharit S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. PubMed ID: 28863884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three Dimensional Printed Surgical Guides: Effect of Time on Dimensional Stability.
Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Di Gioia C; Ercoli C; Laino L
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):431-438. PubMed ID: 35900900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
