325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31887792)
1. The Effect of Stereoscopic Augmented Reality Visualization on Learning Anatomy and the Modifying Effect of Visual-Spatial Abilities: A Double-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.
Bogomolova K; van der Ham IJM; Dankbaar MEW; van den Broek WW; Hovius SER; van der Hage JA; Hierck BP
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Sep; 13(5):558-567. PubMed ID: 31887792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of binocular disparity on learning anatomy with stereoscopic augmented reality visualization: A double center randomized controlled trial.
Bogomolova K; Vorstenbosch MATM; El Messaoudi I; Holla M; Hovius SER; van der Hage JA; Hierck BP
Anat Sci Educ; 2023 Jan; 16(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 34894205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models.
Berney S; Bétrancourt M; Molinari G; Hoyek N
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 25689057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy Dissection Course Improves the Initially Lower Levels of Visual-Spatial Abilities of Medical Undergraduates.
Bogomolova K; Hierck BP; van der Hage JA; Hovius SER
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 May; 13(3):333-342. PubMed ID: 31301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of 3D vascular stereoscopic models in anatomy instruction for first year medical students.
Cui D; Wilson TD; Rockhold RW; Lehman MN; Lynch JC
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 27273896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.
Bork F; Stratmann L; Enssle S; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):585-598. PubMed ID: 30697948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomy Visualizations Using Stereopsis: Assessment and Implication of Stereoscopic Virtual Models in Anatomical Education.
Meyer ER; Cui D
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2020; 1235():117-130. PubMed ID: 32488639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning in Stereo: The Relationship Between Spatial Ability and 3D Digital Anatomy Models.
Labranche L; Wilson TD; Terrell M; Kulesza RJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2022 Mar; 15(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 33527687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional Visualization Software Assists Learning in Students with Diverse Spatial Intelligence in Medical Education.
Jamil Z; Saeed AA; Madhani S; Baig S; Cheema Z; Fatima SS
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Sep; 12(5):550-560. PubMed ID: 30376698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Application for Learning Neuroanatomy in Psychology.
Mendez-Lopez M; Juan MC; Molla R; Fidalgo C
Anat Sci Educ; 2022 May; 15(3):535-551. PubMed ID: 33866682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Augmented Reality in Gross Anatomy Teaching: A Quantitative and Qualitative Pilot Study.
Bork F; Lehner A; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Sep; 14(5):590-604. PubMed ID: 32892494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Anatomy Computer-Assisted Learning on Spatial Abilities of Medical Students.
Guimarães B; Firmino-Machado J; Tsisar S; Viana B; Pinto-Sousa M; Vieira-Marques P; Cruz-Correia R; Ferreira MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):138-153. PubMed ID: 29762903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a Virtual Three-Dimensional Assessment Scenario for Anatomical Education.
Bogomolova K; Sam AH; Misky AT; Gupte CM; Strutton PH; Hurkxkens TJ; Hierck BP
Anat Sci Educ; 2021 May; 14(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 33465814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroanatomy Learning: Augmented Reality vs. Cross-Sections.
Henssen DJHA; van den Heuvel L; De Jong G; Vorstenbosch MATM; van Cappellen van Walsum AM; Van den Hurk MM; Kooloos JGM; Bartels RHMA
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 May; 13(3):353-365. PubMed ID: 31269322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does 3D stereoscopy support anatomical education?
Bernard F; Richard P; Kahn A; Fournier HD
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Jul; 42(7):843-852. PubMed ID: 32248256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Harnessing Augmented Reality and CT to Teach First-Year Medical Students Head and Neck Anatomy.
Weeks JK; Pakpoor J; Park BJ; Robinson NJ; Rubinstein NA; Prouty SM; Nachiappan AC
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):871-876. PubMed ID: 32828663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bölek KA; De Jong G; Henssen D
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15292. PubMed ID: 34315955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmented reality-based learning for the comprehension of cardiac physiology in undergraduate biomedical students.
Gonzalez AA; Lizana PA; Pino S; Miller BG; Merino C
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Sep; 44(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 32568005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of stereoscopic imagery and motion on anatomical structure recognition and visual attention performance.
Remmele M; Schmidt E; Lingenfelder M; Martens A
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 28561952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objects drawn from haptic perception and vision-based spatial abilities.
Langlois J; Hamstra SJ; Dagenais Y; Lemieux R; Lecourtois M; Yetisir E; Bellemare C; Bergeron G; Wells GA
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Mar; 17(2):433-443. PubMed ID: 38108595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
