374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31888615)
1. The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.
Liu Y; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang X; Wang X
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(1):288. PubMed ID: 31888615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic extraction of imaging observation and assessment categories from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports with natural language processing.
Liu Y; Zhu LN; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang XD; Wang XY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Jul; 132(14):1673-1680. PubMed ID: 31268905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.
Bozkurt S; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Gulkesen KH; Rubin DL
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():224-31. PubMed ID: 27388877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.
Sippo DA; Warden GI; Andriole KP; Lacson R; Ikuta I; Birdwell RL; Khorasani R
J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 23868515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.
Bozkurt S; Lipson JA; Senol U; Rubin DL
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e81-92. PubMed ID: 25352567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of natural language processing to post-structuring of rectal cancer MRI reports.
Liu W; Cai L; Li Y
Clin Radiol; 2024 Feb; 79(2):e204-e210. PubMed ID: 38042740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic classification and prioritisation of actionable BI-RADS categories using natural language processing models.
López-Úbeda P; Martín-Noguerol T; Luna A
Clin Radiol; 2024 Jan; 79(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 37838546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Value of Lesion Size as an Adjunct to the BI-RADS-MRI 2013 Descriptors in the Diagnosis of Solitary Breast Masses.
Kawai M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Iima M; Onishi N; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 29213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.
Castro SM; Tseytlin E; Medvedeva O; Mitchell K; Visweswaran S; Bekhuis T; Jacobson RS
J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():177-187. PubMed ID: 28428140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlating mammographic and pathologic findings in clinical decision support using natural language processing and data mining methods.
Patel TA; Puppala M; Ogunti RO; Ensor JE; He T; Shewale JB; Ankerst DP; Kaklamani VG; Rodriguez AA; Wong ST; Chang JC
Cancer; 2017 Jan; 123(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 27571243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Natural Language Processing to Extract Abnormal Results From Cancer Screening Reports.
Moore CR; Farrag A; Ashkin E
J Patient Saf; 2017 Sep; 13(3):138-143. PubMed ID: 25025472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding a Model-free Diffusion MRI Marker to BI-RADS Assessment Improves Specificity for Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
Goto M; Le Bihan D; Yoshida M; Sakai K; Yamada K
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 31112086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discerning tumor status from unstructured MRI reports--completeness of information in existing reports and utility of automated natural language processing.
Cheng LT; Zheng J; Savova GK; Erickson BJ
J Digit Imaging; 2010 Apr; 23(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 19484309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated medical chart review for breast cancer outcomes research: a novel natural language processing extraction system.
Chen Y; Hao L; Zou VZ; Hollander Z; Ng RT; Isaac KV
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):136. PubMed ID: 35549854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using natural language processing to extract mammographic findings.
Gao H; Aiello Bowles EJ; Carrell D; Buist DS
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Apr; 54():77-84. PubMed ID: 25661260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extraction of BI-RADS findings from breast ultrasound reports in Chinese using deep learning approaches.
Miao S; Xu T; Wu Y; Xie H; Wang J; Jing S; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Yang Y; Zhang X; Shan T; Wang L; Xu H; Wang S; Liu Y
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Nov; 119():17-21. PubMed ID: 30342682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehensive Word-Level Classification of Screening Mammography Reports Using a Neural Network Sequence Labeling Approach.
Short RG; Bralich J; Bogaty D; Befera NT
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):685-692. PubMed ID: 30338478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated Detection of Measurements and Their Descriptors in Radiology Reports Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Algorithm.
Bozkurt S; Alkim E; Banerjee I; Rubin DL
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):544-553. PubMed ID: 31222557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
