BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31889511)

  • 21. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: an observational follow up study.
    Schüler IM; Hiller M; Roloff T; Kühnisch J; Heinrich-Weltzien R
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1396-403. PubMed ID: 24994618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the Treatment Assessments of the Conventional Stainless-Steel Crown Restorations and the Hall Technique.
    Ayedun OS; Oredugba FA; Sote EO
    West Afr J Med; 2020; 37(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 32476119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalga.
    Holan G; Fuks AB; Ketlz N
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 12064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of zirconia crowns compared with stainless steel crowns in primary posterior teeth rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Patnana AK; Chugh VK; Chugh A; Vanga NRV; Kumar P
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2022 Feb; 153(2):158-166.e5. PubMed ID: 35086644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical outcomes for early childhood caries: influence of aggressive dental surgery.
    Graves CE; Berkowitz RJ; Proskin HM; Chase I; Weinstein P; Billings R
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 15587091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro and clinical outcome of sandwich restorations with a bulk-fill flowable composite liner for pulpotomized primary teeth.
    Cantekin K; Gumus H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 25571688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stainless steel crown versus multisurface amalgam restorations: an 8-year longitudinal clinical study.
    Einwag J; Dünninger P
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):321-3. PubMed ID: 8941814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar.
    Mittal HC; Goyal A; Gauba K; Kapur A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(5):345-52. PubMed ID: 27617373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: a retrospective study.
    Ludwig KH; Fontana M; Vinson LA; Platt JA; Dean JA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Dec; 145(12):1248-53. PubMed ID: 25429038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A randomised controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth.
    Walia T; Salami AA; Bashiri R; Hamoodi OM; Rashid F
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Jun; 15(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 25102458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth.
    Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; D'Hoore W; Carvalho J; Qvist V
    J Dent; 2003 Aug; 31(6):395-405. PubMed ID: 12878022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of stainless steel crowns vs. multisurface amalgam restorations in the posterior primary dentition.
    Braff MH
    J Pedod; 1982; 6(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 6821167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Periapical Status of Root-filled Teeth Restored with Composite, Amalgam, or Full Crown Restorations: A Cross-sectional Study of a Swedish Adult Population.
    Dawson VS; Petersson K; Wolf E; Åkerman S
    J Endod; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1326-33. PubMed ID: 27452294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of dental procedures performed on children under general anesthesia.
    Al-Eheideb AA; Herman NG
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(2):181-3. PubMed ID: 12597693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survival of stainless-steel crowns and composite resin restorations in molars affected by molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH).
    de Farias AL; Rojas-Gualdrón DF; Mejía JD; Bussaneli DG; Santos-Pinto L; Restrepo M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2022 Mar; 32(2):240-250. PubMed ID: 34115431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of dental restorative materials on salivary Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli in the primary dentition.
    Willershausen B; Ernst CP; Kasaj A; Topf J; Pistorius A
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2003; 1(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 15645937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars in Germany: Questionnaire-based cross-sectional analysis.
    Santamaría RM; Pawlowitz L; Schmoeckel J; Alkilzy M; Splieth CH
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 28(6):587-594. PubMed ID: 30066455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of stainless steel crowns.
    Seale NS
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 12412965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Guelmann M; Fair J; Bimstein E
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):478-81. PubMed ID: 16532888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.