172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31890328)
1. Calibration of Portable Particulate Matter-Monitoring Device using Web Query and Machine Learning.
Loh BG; Choi GH
Saf Health Work; 2019 Dec; 10(4):452-460. PubMed ID: 31890328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calibration of a low-cost PM
Wang Y; Du Y; Wang J; Li T
Environ Int; 2019 Dec; 133(Pt A):105161. PubMed ID: 31610367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Secure Enhancement for MQTT Protocol Using Distributed Machine Learning Framework.
Alotaibi NS; Sayed Ahmed HI; Kamel SOM; ElKabbany GF
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38475174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On-field test and data calibration of a low-cost sensor for fine particles exposure assessment.
Jiang Y; Zhu X; Chen C; Ge Y; Wang W; Zhao Z; Cai J; Kan H
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Mar; 211():111958. PubMed ID: 33503545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibration Methods for Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors Considering Seasonal Variability.
Kang J; Choi K
Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38793878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-Scenario Validation and Assessment of a Particulate Matter Sensor Monitor Optimized by Machine Learning Methods.
Tang H; Cai Y; Gao S; Sun J; Ning Z; Yu Z; Pan J; Zhao Z
Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM
Wang WV; Lung SC; Liu CH
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(17):. PubMed ID: 32899301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-cost sensors for measuring airborne particulate matter: Field evaluation and calibration at a South-Eastern European site.
Kosmopoulos G; Salamalikis V; Pandis SN; Yannopoulos P; Bloutsos AA; Kazantzidis A
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 748():141396. PubMed ID: 32798875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a light-scattering PM2.5 sensor monitor based on the long-term gravimetric measurements in field tests.
Shi J; Chen F; Cai Y; Fan S; Cai J; Chen R; Kan H; Lu Y; Zhao Z
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0185700. PubMed ID: 29121101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-linear probabilistic calibration of low-cost environmental air pollution sensor networks for neighborhood level spatiotemporal exposure assessment.
Patton A; Datta A; Zamora ML; Buehler C; Xiong F; Gentner DR; Koehler K
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):908-916. PubMed ID: 36352094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of PM
Li Z; Che W; Frey HC; Lau AKH; Lin C
Environ Pollut; 2017 Sep; 228():433-442. PubMed ID: 28558284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM
Datta A; Saha A; Zamora ML; Buehler C; Hao L; Xiong F; Gentner DR; Koehler K
Atmos Environ (1994); 2020 Dec; 242():. PubMed ID: 32922146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monitoring of PM
Wang Y; Xu Z
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33114770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating PM
Zhang P; Ma W; Wen F; Liu L; Yang L; Song J; Wang N; Liu Q
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Dec; 225():112772. PubMed ID: 34530262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.
Zusman M; Schumacher CS; Gassett AJ; Spalt EW; Austin E; Larson TV; Carvlin G; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31783241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Air Pollution Sensors for Environmental Exposure Research.
Huang J; Kwan MP; Cai J; Song W; Yu C; Kan Z; Yim SH
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a network of lower-cost monitors to identify the influence of modifiable factors driving spatial patterns in fine particulate matter concentrations in an urban environment.
Rose Eilenberg S; Subramanian R; Malings C; Hauryliuk A; Presto AA; Robinson AL
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):949-961. PubMed ID: 32764710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities-a case study in Sheffield.
Munir S; Mayfield M; Coca D; Jubb SA; Osammor O
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):94. PubMed ID: 30671683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
