These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31891986)

  • 1. Women's experiences and satisfaction with having a cesarean birth: An integrative review.
    Coates D; Thirukumar P; Henry A
    Birth; 2020 Jun; 47(2):169-182. PubMed ID: 31891986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors associated with women's birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study.
    Coates D; Donnolley N; Foureur M; Thirukumar P; Henry A
    Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102944. PubMed ID: 33610064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's experiences of intrapartum care and recovery in relation to planned caesarean sections: An interview study.
    Thirukumar P; Coates D; Henry A
    Women Birth; 2021 May; 34(3):e248-e254. PubMed ID: 32507502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What are women's mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review.
    Coates D; Thirukumar P; Spear V; Brown G; Henry A
    Women Birth; 2020 Jul; 33(4):323-333. PubMed ID: 31607640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'Off everyone's radar': Australian women's experiences of medically necessary elective caesarean section.
    Bayes S; Fenwick J; Hauck Y
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e900-9. PubMed ID: 22341090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial.
    Kingdon C; Baker L; Lavender T
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 16948723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.
    Gamble J; Creedy DK; McCourt C; Weaver J; Beake S
    Birth; 2007 Dec; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 18021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
    Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
    Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.
    Boz İ; Teskereci G; Akman G
    Women Birth; 2016 Aug; 29(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 26846560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Women's experiences of decision-making and beliefs in relation to planned caesarean section: A survey study.
    Coates D; Donnolley N; Thirukumar P; Lainchbury A; Spear V; Henry A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):106-115. PubMed ID: 32964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Women's preferences for mode of second birth-A prospective study of two Israeli birth cohorts.
    Preis H; Mor P; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Samueloff A; Gabbay-Benziv R; Chen R; Eisner M; Pardo J; Peled Y; Wiznitzer A; Benyamini Y
    Birth; 2020 Jun; 47(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 32052497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primigravid women's views of being approached to participate in a hypothetical term cephalic trial of planned vaginal birth versus planned cesarean birth.
    Lavender T; Kingdon C
    Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 19747268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors.
    Gamble JA; Creedy DK
    Birth; 2001 Jun; 28(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 11380381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Satisfaction with cesarean section: qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey.
    Porter M; van Teijlingen E; Chi Ying Yip L; Bhattacharya S
    Birth; 2007 Jun; 34(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 17542819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences on vaginal birth after caesarean section: A qualitative study of Taiwanese women.
    Chen MM; McKellar L; Pincombe J
    Women Birth; 2017 Apr; 30(2):e132-e139. PubMed ID: 27818106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.
    Declercq ER; Belanoff C; Sakala C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 65(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 31448884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.
    Graham WJ; Hundley V; McCheyne AL; Hall MH; Gurney E; Milne J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 10426639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'It will dictate how many children I will have"- Women's decision-making in pregnancy following a previous caesarean birth (CB).
    Monis M; O'Connell R; Andrews T
    Midwifery; 2023 Jan; 116():103533. PubMed ID: 36347147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.