These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31892539)

  • 1. A general-purpose protein design framework based on mining sequence-structure relationships in known protein structures.
    Zhou J; Panaitiu AE; Grigoryan G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(2):1059-1068. PubMed ID: 31892539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rosetta FunFolDes - A general framework for the computational design of functional proteins.
    Bonet J; Wehrle S; Schriever K; Yang C; Billet A; Sesterhenn F; Scheck A; Sverrisson F; Veselkova B; Vollers S; Lourman R; Villard M; Rosset S; Krey T; Correia BE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006623. PubMed ID: 30452434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Framework of Computational Protein Design.
    Samish I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():3-19. PubMed ID: 27914044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. rstoolbox - a Python library for large-scale analysis of computational protein design data and structural bioinformatics.
    Bonet J; Harteveld Z; Sesterhenn F; Scheck A; Correia BE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):240. PubMed ID: 31092198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Achievements and Challenges in Computational Protein Design.
    Samish I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():21-94. PubMed ID: 27914045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in computational protein design.
    Park S; Yang X; Saven JG
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Aug; 14(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 15313244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data driven flexible backbone protein design.
    Sun MGF; Kim PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1005722. PubMed ID: 28837553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards comprehensive structural motif mining for better fold annotation in the "twilight zone" of sequence dissimilarity.
    Jia Y; Huan J; Buhr V; Zhang J; Carayannopoulos LN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S46. PubMed ID: 19208148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tertiary structural propensities reveal fundamental sequence/structure relationships.
    Zheng F; Zhang J; Grigoryan G
    Structure; 2015 May; 23(5):961-971. PubMed ID: 25914055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid search for tertiary fragments reveals protein sequence-structure relationships.
    Zhou J; Grigoryan G
    Protein Sci; 2015 Apr; 24(4):508-24. PubMed ID: 25420575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the existing and potential structural space of proteins by large-scale multiple loop permutations.
    Dai L; Zhou Y
    J Mol Biol; 2011 May; 408(3):585-95. PubMed ID: 21376059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Socket: a program for identifying and analysing coiled-coil motifs within protein structures.
    Walshaw J; Woolfson DN
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 307(5):1427-50. PubMed ID: 11292353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current updates on computer aided protein modeling and designing.
    Khan FI; Wei DQ; Gu KR; Hassan MI; Tabrez S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2016 Apr; 85():48-62. PubMed ID: 26730484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational Protein Design Through Grafting and Stabilization.
    Zhu C; Mowrey DD; Dokholyan NV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():227-241. PubMed ID: 27914054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins.
    Tinberg CE; Khare SD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():363-373. PubMed ID: 27914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Progress in computational protein design.
    Lippow SM; Tidor B
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 18(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17644370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multistate Computational Protein Design with Backbone Ensembles.
    Davey JA; Chica RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():161-179. PubMed ID: 27914050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring Protein Supersecondary Structure Through Changes in Protein Folding, Stability, and Flexibility.
    Pires DEV; Rodrigues CHM; Albanaz ATS; Karmakar M; Myung Y; Xavier J; Michanetzi EM; Portelli S; Ascher DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():173-185. PubMed ID: 30945219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study.
    Klepeis JL; Wei Y; Hecht MH; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):560-70. PubMed ID: 15609306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.