200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31892667)
1. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.
Walters C; Harter ZJ; Wayant C; Vo N; Warren M; Chronister J; Tritz D; Vassar M
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033962. PubMed ID: 31892667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of transparent and reproducible research practices in the psychiatry literature.
Sherry CE; Pollard JZ; Tritz D; Carr BK; Pierce A; Vassar M
Gen Psychiatr; 2020; 33(1):e100149. PubMed ID: 32175523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017.
Wallach JD; Boyack KW; Ioannidis JPA
PLoS Biol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):e2006930. PubMed ID: 30457984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research.
Rauh S; Torgerson T; Johnson AL; Pollard J; Tritz D; Vassar M
Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():5. PubMed ID: 32161667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in otolaryngology.
Johnson AL; Torgerson T; Skinner M; Hamilton T; Tritz D; Vassar M
Laryngoscope; 2020 Aug; 130(8):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 31593300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology.
Smith CA; Nolan J; Tritz DJ; Heavener TE; Pelton J; Cook K; Vassar M
Pulmonology; 2021; 27(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 32739326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of indicators supporting reproducibility and transparency within cardiology literature.
Anderson JM; Wright B; Rauh S; Tritz D; Horn J; Parker I; Bergeron D; Cook S; Vassar M
Heart; 2021 Jan; 107(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 32826286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature.
Hughes BT; Niemann A; Tritz D; Boyer K; Robbins H; Vassar M
J Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 274():116-124. PubMed ID: 35150944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Evaluation of Nephrology Literature for Transparency and Reproducibility Indicators: Cross-Sectional Review.
Fladie IA; Adewumi TM; Vo NH; Tritz DJ; Vassar MB
Kidney Int Rep; 2020 Feb; 5(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 32043031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the practice of transparency and reproducibility in addiction medicine literature.
Adewumi MT; Vo N; Tritz D; Beaman J; Vassar M
Addict Behav; 2021 Jan; 112():106560. PubMed ID: 32763621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
J Neurosci Res; 2019 Apr; 97(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 30506706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducible Research Practices in the Plastic Surgery Literature.
Ascha M; Katabi L; Stevens E; Gatherwright J; Vassar M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):810e-823e. PubMed ID: 35196293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.
Iqbal SA; Wallach JD; Khoury MJ; Schully SD; Ioannidis JP
PLoS Biol; 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002333. PubMed ID: 26726926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2019 Feb; 2(1):e1150. PubMed ID: 32721132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.
Perlmutter AS; Tran VT; Dechartres A; Ravaud P
Ann Oncol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):688-695. PubMed ID: 28011448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducible research practices and transparency in reproductive endocrinology and infertility articles.
Kemper JM; Rolnik DL; Mol BWJ; Ioannidis JPA
Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 32771255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inconsistent Reporting Between Meta-analysis Protocol and Publication - A Cross-Sectional Study.
Delgado AF; Delgado AF
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5101-5107. PubMed ID: 28870940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.
Rauh S; Johnson BS; Bowers A; Tritz D; Vassar BM
BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):102. PubMed ID: 35820886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
