These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31893357)

  • 21. A system dynamics-based environmental performance simulation of construction waste reduction management in China.
    Ding Z; Yi G; Tam VWY; Huang T
    Waste Manag; 2016 May; 51():130-141. PubMed ID: 26969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: A China study.
    Ma M; Tam VWY; Le KN; Li W
    Waste Manag; 2020 Dec; 118():610-625. PubMed ID: 33010692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantifying the embodied carbon saving potential of recycling construction and demolition waste in the Greater Bay Area, China: Status quo and future scenarios.
    Peng Z; Lu W; Webster CJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148427. PubMed ID: 34144235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A cost compensation model for construction and demolition waste disposal in South China.
    Liu J; Teng Y; Jiang Y; Gong E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(14):13773-13784. PubMed ID: 30128974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Economic benefit analysis of the carbon potential of construction waste resource management based on a simulation of carbon trading policy.
    Liu J; Li J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(36):85986-86009. PubMed ID: 37395881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimization of Management Structure and Resource Coordination Management Method of Construction Enterprises under Urban Environmental Pollution.
    Xing Y
    J Environ Public Health; 2022; 2022():3823835. PubMed ID: 35990549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the performance and intellectual structure of construction and demolition waste research during 2000-2016.
    Liu Y; Sun T; Yang L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(23):19259-19266. PubMed ID: 28667584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the effects of policies on building construction waste management: a hybrid dynamic approach.
    Ding Z; Sun Z; Liu R; Xu X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(25):67378-67397. PubMed ID: 37103696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of the Evolution Game of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Behavior Based on Prospect Theory under Environmental Regulation.
    Shen H; Peng Y; Guo C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 30021981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clean construction and demolition waste material cycles through optimised pre-demolition waste audit documentation: A review on building material assessment tools.
    Rašković M; Ragossnig AM; Kondracki K; Ragossnig-Angst M
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):923-941. PubMed ID: 32635832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial differentiation of carbon emissions reduction potential for construction and demolition waste recycling.
    Wang Z; Qin F; Liu J; Xia B; Chileshe N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Dec; 30(58):122304-122321. PubMed ID: 37966638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Building demolition waste management through smart BIM: A case study in Hong Kong.
    Kang K; Besklubova S; Dai Y; Zhong RY
    Waste Manag; 2022 Apr; 143():69-83. PubMed ID: 35240449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction of large-scale demolition waste generation during urban renewal: A hybrid trilogy method.
    Yu B; Wang J; Li J; Zhang J; Lai Y; Xu X
    Waste Manag; 2019 Apr; 89():1-9. PubMed ID: 31079722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.
    Islam R; Nazifa TH; Yuniarto A; Shanawaz Uddin ASM; Salmiati S; Shahid S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():10-21. PubMed ID: 31351595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Co-evolutionary simulation study of multiple stakeholders in the take-out waste recycling industry chain.
    Long R; Yang J; Chen H; Li Q; Fang W; Wang L
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():701-713. PubMed ID: 30396143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a hybrid model to predict construction and demolition waste: China as a case study.
    Song Y; Wang Y; Liu F; Zhang Y
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jan; 59():350-361. PubMed ID: 27777033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of construction and demolition waste management between Brazil, European Union and USA.
    Nunes K; Mahler CF
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):415-422. PubMed ID: 32043421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the role and use of recycled aggregates in the sustainable management of construction and demolition waste via a mini-review and a case study.
    Hahladakis JN; Purnell P; Aljabri HMSJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Apr; 38(4):460-471. PubMed ID: 31916495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pilot-based assessment of the economics of recycling construction demolition waste.
    Srour IM; Chehab GR; El-Fadel M; Tamraz S
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1170-9. PubMed ID: 23460542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.