These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31893566)

  • 1. Laboratory Technician Assessment of the Quality of Single-Unit Crown Preparations and Impressions as Predictors of the Clinical Acceptability of Crowns as Determined by the Treating Dentist: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Litaker MS; Thomson AES; Slootsky A; Gilbert GH;
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 31893566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical acceptance of single-unit crowns and its association with impression and tissue displacement techniques: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Lawson NC; Litaker MS; Sowell E; Gordan VV; Mungia R; Ronzo KR; Lam BT; Gilbert GH; McCracken MS;
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):701-709. PubMed ID: 31590974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impression evaluation and laboratory use for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Litaker MS; George AJ; Durand S; Malekpour S; Marshall DG; Meyerowitz C; Carter L; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Nov; 148(11):788-796.e4. PubMed ID: 28822536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remake Rates for Single-Unit Crowns in Clinical Practice: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Litaker MS; Gordan VV; Karr T; Sowell E; Gilbert GH;
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 30412320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impression Techniques Used for Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Louis DR; Litaker MS; Minyé HM; Oates T; Gordan VV; Marshall DG; Meyerowitz C; Gilbert GH;
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):722-732. PubMed ID: 28076661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Pradíes G; Zarauz C; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Martínez-Rus F
    J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 25527248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales.
    Jenkins SJ; Lynch CD; Sloan AJ; Gilmour AS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 19054289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical study comparing marginal and occlusal accuracy of crowns fabricated from double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR
    Aust Dent J; 2005 Jun; 50(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 16050087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preparation Techniques Used to Make Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Minyé HM; Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Mungia R; Meyerowitz C; Louis DR; Slootsky A; Gordan VV; McCracken MS;
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Dec; 27(9):813-820. PubMed ID: 30311319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
    Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative method for restoring single-tooth implants.
    McArdle BF; Clarizio LF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Sep; 132(9):1269-73; quiz 1318-9. PubMed ID: 11665352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Louis DR; Litaker MS; Minyé HM; Mungia R; Gordan VV; Marshall DG; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Nov; 147(11):882-890. PubMed ID: 27492046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized clinical trial of a conventional and a digital workflow for the fabrication of interim crowns: An evaluation of treatment efficiency, fit, and the effect of clinician experience.
    Cheng CW; Ye SY; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P; Ko CC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 32057487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material.
    Sakornwimon N; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 28222872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.