These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31893706)

  • 1. Adaptive and selective production of syllable duration and fundamental frequency as word segmentation cues by French-English bilinguals.
    Gilbert AC; Wolpert M; Saito H; Kousaie S; Itzhak I; Baum SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4255. PubMed ID: 31893706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the Native Language on the Learning of Fundamental Frequency in Second-Language Speech Segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Broersma M; Coughlin CE; Choi J
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():985. PubMed ID: 27445943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spoken Word Segmentation in First and Second Language: When ERP and Behavioral Measures Diverge.
    Gilbert AC; Lee JG; Coulter K; Wolpert MA; Kousaie S; Gracco VL; Klein D; Titone D; Phillips NA; Baum SR
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():705668. PubMed ID: 34603133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosodic Disambiguation in First and Second Language Production: English and Korean.
    Baek H
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):598-624. PubMed ID: 34605716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic Correlates of English Lexical Stress Produced by Chinese Dialect Speakers Compared to Native English Speakers.
    Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():796252. PubMed ID: 35350733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues.
    Endress AD; Hauser MD
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):177-99. PubMed ID: 20573342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds.
    Kallio H; Suni A; Šimko J
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):571-597. PubMed ID: 34479458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vowel reduction in word-final position by early and late Spanish-English bilinguals.
    Byers E; Yavas M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175226. PubMed ID: 28384234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish.
    Flege JE; Munro MJ; Skelton L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jul; 92(1):128-43. PubMed ID: 1512319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reiterant speech as a test of non-native speakers' mastery of the timing of French.
    Levitt AG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):3008-18. PubMed ID: 1787241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic characteristics of Korean-English bilingual speakers' /l/ and the relationship to their foreign accent ratings.
    Chung H; Kim Y
    J Commun Disord; 2021; 94():106157. PubMed ID: 34653724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French.
    Dahan D; Bernard JM
    Lang Speech; 1996; 39 ( Pt 4)():341-74. PubMed ID: 9156500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Speech Segmentation in French-learning Infants: Monosyllabic Words versus Embedded Syllables.
    Nishibayashi LL; Goyet L; Nazzi T
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):334-50. PubMed ID: 26529900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals.
    Fowler CA; Sramko V; Ostry DJ; Rowland SA; Hallé P
    J Phon; 2008 Oct; 36(4):649-663. PubMed ID: 19802325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.
    Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
    J Phon; 2015 Sep; 52():183-204. PubMed ID: 26644630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonetic Encoding of Coda Voicing Contrast under Different Focus Conditions in L1 vs. L2 English.
    Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():624. PubMed ID: 27242571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of L1 prosody on segmental contrast in L2: The case of English stop voicing contrast produced by Korean speakers.
    Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 27036291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship Between Prosody and Intelligibility in Children with Dysarthria.
    Patel R; Hustad KC; Connaghan KP; Furr W
    J Med Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 Dec; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 25614728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.