These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31893753)

  • 21. The usefulness of the acoustic and the capacity analysis of singing voice.
    Nowosielska-Grygiel J; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2019 Apr; 73(3):16-25. PubMed ID: 31249149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.
    Liu H; Wang EQ; Chen Z; Liu P; Larson CR; Huang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3739-46. PubMed ID: 21218905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Voice fundamental frequency modulates vocal response to pitch perturbations during English speech.
    Liu H; Auger J; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):EL1-5. PubMed ID: 20058940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vocal matching of frequency modulation in synthesized vowels.
    King JB; Horii Y
    J Voice; 1993 Jun; 7(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 8353629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.
    Larson CR; Burnett TA; Bauer JJ; Kiran S; Hain TC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):2845-8. PubMed ID: 11785786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Voice Quality in Native and Foreign Languages Investigated by Inverse Filtering and Perceptual Analyses.
    Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):261.e25-261.e31. PubMed ID: 27495969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of vocal abuse: fluctuations in phonation time and intensity in 4 groups of speakers.
    Masuda T; Ikeda Y; Manako H; Komiyama S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Jul; 113(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 8379311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control.
    Burnett TA; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1058-63. PubMed ID: 12243154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A temporal predictive code for voice motor control: Evidence from ERP and behavioral responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
    Behroozmand R; Sangtian S; Korzyukov O; Larson CR
    Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 1636():1-12. PubMed ID: 26835556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of voice harmonic complexity on ERP responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
    Behroozmand R; Korzyukov O; Larson CR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2408-17. PubMed ID: 21719346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vocal-fold collision mass as a differentiator between registers in the low-pitch range.
    Vilkman E; Alku P; Laukkanen AM
    J Voice; 1995 Mar; 9(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 7757152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of vocal parameters in adult bilingual Hebrew-English speakers.
    Nevo L; Nevo C; Oliveira G
    Codas; 2015; 27(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 26648221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.
    Liu H; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3671-7. PubMed ID: 18247774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
    Dallaston K; Docherty G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229960. PubMed ID: 32160255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Vocal capabilities of nonprofessional singers evaluated by measurement and superimposition of their speaking, shouting and singing voice range profiles].
    Hacki T
    HNO; 1999 Sep; 47(9):809-15. PubMed ID: 10525610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the produced and perceived voice range profiles in untrained and trained classical singers.
    Hunter EJ; Svec JG; Titze IR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):513-26. PubMed ID: 16325373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of tones on speaking frequency and intensity ranges in Mandarin and Min dialects.
    Chen SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3225-30. PubMed ID: 15957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice f
    Kim JH; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1482. PubMed ID: 31067945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: a preliminary study.
    Burnett TA; Senner JE; Larson CR
    J Voice; 1997 Jun; 11(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 9181544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of sensorimotor voice training on event-related potentials to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
    Patel S; Hebert K; Korzyukov O; Larson CR
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0269326. PubMed ID: 36662730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.