These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31893769)

  • 1. Experimental investigation of co-flow jet's airfoil flow control by hot wire anemometer.
    Bahrami A; Hoseinzadeh S; Heyns PS; Mirhosseini SM
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2019 Dec; 90(12):125107. PubMed ID: 31893769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of a bio-inspired lift-enhancing effector on a 2D airfoil.
    Johnston J; Gopalarathnam A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2012 Sep; 7(3):036003. PubMed ID: 22498691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancement of aerodynamic performance of a heaving airfoil using synthetic-jet based active flow control.
    Wang C; Tang H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2018 May; 13(4):046005. PubMed ID: 29648545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical Simulation of the Transient Flow around the Combined Morphing Leading-Edge and Trailing-Edge Airfoil.
    Bashir M; Negahban MH; Botez RM; Wong T
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2024 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 38392154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control of leading-edge separation on bioinspired airfoil with fluttering coverts.
    Ma X; Gong X; Tang Z; Jiang N
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Feb; 105(2-2):025107. PubMed ID: 35291149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wind-tunnel tests of synthetic jet control effects on airfoil flow separation.
    Zhao G; Zhao Q; Chen X
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21994. PubMed ID: 36539417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covert-inspired flaps for lift enhancement and stall mitigation.
    Duan C; Wissa A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 Jun; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 33784648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational Investigations on the Effects of Gurney Flap on Airfoil Aerodynamics.
    Jain S; Sitaram N; Krishnaswamy S
    Int Sch Res Notices; 2015; 2015():402358. PubMed ID: 27347517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow visualization over a thick blunt trailing-edge airfoil with base cavity at low Reynolds numbers using PIV technique.
    Taherian G; Nili-Ahmadabadi M; Karimi MH; Tavakoli MR
    J Vis (Tokyo); 2017; 20(4):695-710. PubMed ID: 29026342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flow Control around the UAS-S45 Pitching Airfoil Using a Dynamically Morphing Leading Edge (DMLE): A Numerical Study.
    Bashir M; Zonzini N; Botez RM; Ceruti A; Wong T
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36810382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental study of a passive control of airfoil lift using bioinspired feather flap.
    Wang L; Alam MM; Zhou Y
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2019 Sep; 14(6):066005. PubMed ID: 31434057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary assessment of the NACA0021 trailing edge wedge for wind turbine application.
    Abdalkarem AAM; Ansaf R; Muzammil WK; Ibrahim A; Harun Z; Fazlizan A
    Heliyon; 2023 Nov; 9(11):e21193. PubMed ID: 37942161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Leading Edge Defect on the Aerodynamic and Flow Characteristics of an S809 Airfoil.
    Wang Y; Zheng X; Hu R; Wang P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163443. PubMed ID: 27658310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flight of the honeybee. V. Drag and lift coefficients of the bee's body; implications for flight dynamics.
    Nachtigall W; Hanauer-Thieser U
    J Comp Physiol B; 1992; 162(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 1613166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Airfoil Selection Procedure, Wind Tunnel Experimentation and Implementation of 6DOF Modeling on a Flying Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle.
    Shams TA; Shah SIA; Javed A; Hamdani SHR
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 32486120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational and experimental study on the aerodynamic performance of NACA 4412 airfoil with slot and groove.
    Rayhan AM; Hossain MS; Mim RH; Ali M
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e31595. PubMed ID: 38845868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parameter study of simplified dragonfly airfoil geometry at Reynolds number of 6000.
    Levy DE; Seifert A
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 20673771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations.
    Golmirzaee N; Wood DH
    Adv Aerodyn; 2024; 6(1):7. PubMed ID: 38464493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Turbulence Model Selection for Low Reynolds Number Flows.
    Aftab SM; Mohd Rafie AS; Razak NA; Ahmad KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153755. PubMed ID: 27104354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active control of airfoil turbulent boundary layer noise with trailing-edge blowing.
    Yang C; Arcondoulis EJG; Yang Y; Guo J; Maryami R; Bi C; Liu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Apr; 153(4):2115. PubMed ID: 37092929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.