These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31893911)
1. An analysis of isomorphic RPMD in the golden rule limit. Lawrence JE; Manolopoulos DE J Chem Phys; 2019 Dec; 151(24):244109. PubMed ID: 31893911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the calculation of quantum mechanical electron transfer rates. Lawrence JE; Fletcher T; Lindoy LP; Manolopoulos DE J Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 151(11):114119. PubMed ID: 31542014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonadiabatic dynamics with quantum nuclei: simulating charge transfer with ring polymer surface hopping. Ghosh S; Giannini S; Lively K; Blumberger J Faraday Discuss; 2019 Dec; 221(0):501-525. PubMed ID: 31538635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calculation of electron transfer rates using mixed quantum classical approaches: nonadiabatic limit and beyond. Xie W; Bai S; Zhu L; Shi Q J Phys Chem A; 2013 Jul; 117(29):6196-204. PubMed ID: 23534444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the role of decoherence in condensed-phase nonadiabatic dynamics: a comparison of different mixed quantum/classical simulation algorithms for the excited hydrated electron. Larsen RE; Bedard-Hearn MJ; Schwartz BJ J Phys Chem B; 2006 Oct; 110(40):20055-66. PubMed ID: 17020394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Golden rule kinetics of transfer reactions in condensed phase: the microscopic model of electron transfer reactions in disordered solid matrices. Basilevsky MV; Odinokov AV; Titov SV; Mitina EA J Chem Phys; 2013 Dec; 139(23):234102. PubMed ID: 24359347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonadiabatic quantum transition-state theory in the golden-rule limit. I. Theory and application to model systems. Thapa MJ; Fang W; Richardson JO J Chem Phys; 2019 Mar; 150(10):104107. PubMed ID: 30876356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Dynamics with Coupled Trajectories: A Rigorous Approach to Quantum (De)Coherence. Min SK; Agostini F; Tavernelli I; Gross EKU J Phys Chem Lett; 2017 Jul; 8(13):3048-3055. PubMed ID: 28618782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct simulation of electron transfer using ring polymer molecular dynamics: comparison with semiclassical instanton theory and exact quantum methods. Menzeleev AR; Ananth N; Miller TF J Chem Phys; 2011 Aug; 135(7):074106. PubMed ID: 21861555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonadiabatic quantum transition-state theory in the golden-rule limit. II. Overcoming the pitfalls of the saddle-point and semiclassical approximations. Fang W; Thapa MJ; Richardson JO J Chem Phys; 2019 Dec; 151(21):214101. PubMed ID: 31822067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Path-integral isomorphic Hamiltonian for including nuclear quantum effects in non-adiabatic dynamics. Tao X; Shushkov P; Miller TF J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):102327. PubMed ID: 29544332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of tunnelling and asymmetry for system-bath models of electron transfer. Mattiat J; Richardson JO J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):102311. PubMed ID: 29544261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kinetically-constrained ring-polymer molecular dynamics for non-adiabatic chemistries involving solvent and donor-acceptor dynamical effects. Kretchmer JS; Miller Iii TF Faraday Discuss; 2016 Dec; 195():191-214. PubMed ID: 27722690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Path integral formulation for quantum nonadiabatic dynamics and the mixed quantum classical limit. Krishna V J Chem Phys; 2007 Apr; 126(13):134107. PubMed ID: 17430016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mean-field dynamics with stochastic decoherence (MF-SD): a new algorithm for nonadiabatic mixed quantum/classical molecular-dynamics simulations with nuclear-induced decoherence. Bedard-Hearn MJ; Larsen RE; Schwartz BJ J Chem Phys; 2005 Dec; 123(23):234106. PubMed ID: 16392913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of different methods for calculating electronic transition rates. Kananenka AA; Sun X; Schubert A; Dunietz BD; Geva E J Chem Phys; 2018 Mar; 148(10):102304. PubMed ID: 29544297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic friction near metal surface: Incorporating nuclear quantum effect with ring polymer molecular dynamics. Bi RH; Dou W J Chem Phys; 2024 Feb; 160(7):. PubMed ID: 38380747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recovering Marcus Theory Rates and Beyond without the Need for Decoherence Corrections: The Mapping Approach to Surface Hopping. Lawrence JE; Mannouch JR; Richardson JO J Phys Chem Lett; 2024 Jan; 15(3):707-716. PubMed ID: 38214476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking the Surface Hopping Method to Include Nuclear Quantum Effects. Sindhu A; Jain A J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Feb; 17(2):655-665. PubMed ID: 33432812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ring-polymer instanton theory of electron transfer in the nonadiabatic limit. Richardson JO J Chem Phys; 2015 Oct; 143(13):134116. PubMed ID: 26450301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]