These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31894569)

  • 1. Three-Dimensional Geometry of Phalanges as a Proxy for Pair-Matching: Mesh Comparison Using an ICP Algorithm.
    Tsiminikaki K; Karell MA; Nathena D; Halazonetis D; Spanakis K; Kranioti EF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1205():55-69. PubMed ID: 31894569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel method for pair-matching using three-dimensional digital models of bone: mesh-to-mesh value comparison.
    Karell MA; Langstaff HK; Halazonetis DJ; Minghetti C; Frelat M; Kranioti EF
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Sep; 130(5):1315-22. PubMed ID: 26966098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pair-Matching Digital 3D Models of Temporomandibular Fragments Using Mesh-To-Mesh Value Comparison and Implications for Commingled Human Remain Assemblages.
    Acuff AS; Karell MA; Spanakis KE; Kranioti EF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2021; 1317():1-16. PubMed ID: 33945129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advances in Osteometric Sorting: Utilizing Diaphyseal CSG Properties for Lower Limb Skeletal Pair-Matching.
    Bertsatos A; Chovalopoulou ME
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 32569430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Next-generation osteometric sorting: Using 3D shape, elliptical Fourier analysis, and Hausdorff distance to optimize osteological pair-matching.
    Fancourt HSM; Lynch JJ; Byrd JE; Stephan CN
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):821-836. PubMed ID: 33550609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the Functionality of Mesh-to-Mesh Value Comparison in Pair-Matching and Its Application to Fragmentary Remains.
    McWhirter Z; Karell MA; Er A; Bozdag M; Ekizoglu O; Kranioti EF
    Biology (Basel); 2021 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 34943218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital pair-matching of iliac bones: pilot study on a three-dimensional approach with models acquired through stereophotogrammetry.
    Palamenghi A; Mazzarelli D; Cappella A; De Angelis D; Sforza C; Cattaneo C; Gibelli D
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 36195690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D-3D Superimposition of Pubic Bones: Expanding the Anthropological Toolkit for the Pair-Matching of Commingled Skeletal Remains.
    Palamenghi A; Cappella A; Cellina M; Mazzarelli D; De Angelis D; Sforza C; Cattaneo C; Gibelli D
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36671723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposed method for predicting pair matching of skeletal elements allows too many false rejections.
    Vickers S; Lubinski PM; Henebry DeLeon L; Bowen JT
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 25069587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open-Source Tools for Dense Facial Tissue Depth Mapping of Computed Tomography Models.
    Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti C; Falsetti AB; Ehrhardt CJ
    Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 30387384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the applicability of regression equations for sorting commingled remains on 3-Dimensional bony elements from CT scans.
    De Simone S; Hackman LS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():160-165. PubMed ID: 31158613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair-Matching.
    Lynch JJ; Byrd J; LeGarde CB
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28547802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The virtual approach to the assessment of skeletal injuries in human skeletal remains of forensic importance.
    Urbanová P; Ross AH; Jurda M; Šplíchalová I
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Jul; 49():59-75. PubMed ID: 28586732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized reconstruction of fragmentary skeletal remains.
    Mahfouz MR; Mustafa A; Abdel Fatah EE; Herrmann NP; Langley NR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():212-223. PubMed ID: 28411500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Automated Two-dimensional Pairwise form Registration Method for Pair-matching of Fragmented Skeletal Remains.
    Lynch JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1790-1795. PubMed ID: 29637565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An exclusionary screening method based on 3D morphometric features to sort commingled atlases and axes.
    Cappella A; Palamenghi A; Solazzo R; Mazzarelli D; Gibelli D; Sforza C; Cattaneo C
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13149. PubMed ID: 38849396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. American alligator proximal pedal phalanges resemble human finger bones: Diagnostic criteria for forensic investigators.
    Ferraro JV; Binetti KM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jul; 240():151.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24815617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tables for the metric evaluation of pair-matching of human skeletal elements.
    Thomas RM; Ubelaker DH; Byrd JE
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):952-6. PubMed ID: 23682771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of the most likely number of individuals from commingled human skeletal remains.
    Adams BJ; Konigsberg LW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Oct; 125(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 15365980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D shape-dependent thinning method for trabecular bone characterization.
    Jennane R; Almhdie A; Aufort G; Lespessailles E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 22225286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.