These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Effects of temperature and conditioning on contact lens wetting angles. Knick PD; Huff JW CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 1654228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wetting angles of rigid contact lens plastics: the effect of contact lens wear. Poster MG; Gelfer DM; Fernandez NM J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Jun; 57(6):452-4. PubMed ID: 3722689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surfactant solutions and porous substrates: spreading and imbibition. Starov VM Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Nov; 111(1-2):3-27. PubMed ID: 15571660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel approach to measuring the wettability of rigid contact lenses. Mass measurement of the adherent liquid on the rigid lens surface (1). Shirafkan A; Woodward EG; Hull CC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 Nov; 15(6):575-83. PubMed ID: 8594529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components. Cheng L; Muller SJ; Radke CJ Curr Eye Res; 2004 Feb; 28(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 14972715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical findings correlated with contact angles on rigid gas permeable contact lens surfaces in vivo. Bourassa S; Benjamin WJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Aug; 60(8):584-90. PubMed ID: 2794327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prentice Medal lecture: contact lens wettability--myths, mysteries, and realities. Fatt I Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Jul; 61(7):419-30. PubMed ID: 6465272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro water wettability of silicone hydrogel contact lenses determined using the sessile drop and captive bubble techniques. Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Nov; 83(2):496-502. PubMed ID: 17503532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Bruinsma GM; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3217-24. PubMed ID: 11700793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phagocytosis and hydrophobicity: a method of calculating contact angles based on the diameter of sessile drops. Dahlgren C; Sunqvist T J Immunol Methods; 1981; 40(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 16944558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact Angle Measurement on Curved Wetting Surfaces in Multiphase Lattice Boltzmann Method. Liu Y; Yao Y; Li Q; Zhong X; He B; Wen B Langmuir; 2023 Feb; 39(8):2974-2984. PubMed ID: 36787627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomised controlled trial of the effects of two rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens materials and two surface cleaners on straylight values. Fortuin MF; Schilperoort J; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; van den Berg TJ; Kiers H Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):497-508. PubMed ID: 19689546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct Laser Writing of Nanophotonic Structures on Contact Lenses. AlQattan B; Yetisen AK; Butt H ACS Nano; 2018 Jun; 12(6):5130-5140. PubMed ID: 29688698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physicochemical surface properties of various intraocular lenses. Dick HB; Frohn A; Augustin AJ; Wolters B; Pakula T; Pfeiffer N Ophthalmic Res; 2001; 33(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11721181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of the total attenuation coefficient for six contact lens materials using the Beer-Lambert law. Hull CC; Crofts NC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 8762777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]