These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31895276)

  • 1. Effect of Simulated and Real Spherical and Astigmatism Defocus on Visual Acuity and Image Quality Score.
    Vincent M; Marin G; Legras R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jan; 97(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 31895276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective Evaluation of Defocus and Astigmatism Combinations Using Image Simulation in Presbyopes.
    Vincent M; Marin G; Legras R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jan; 98(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 33394934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distance and near visual performance in pseudophakic eyes with simulated spherical and astigmatic blur.
    Serra P; Chisholm C; Sanchez Trancon A; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 26840890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blur limits for defocus, astigmatism and trefoil.
    Atchison DA; Guo H; Charman WN; Fisher SW
    Vision Res; 2009 Sep; 49(19):2393-403. PubMed ID: 19631683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limits of spherical blur determined with an adaptive optics mirror.
    Atchison DA; Guo H; Fisher SW
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 19422562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement and prediction of subjective gradations of images in presence of monochromatic aberrations.
    Legras R; Benard Y
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():52-8. PubMed ID: 23624229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective blur limits for cylinder.
    Guo H; Atchison DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 87(8):E549-59. PubMed ID: 20562670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different types of astigmatism on visual acuity.
    Remón L; Monsoriu JA; Furlan WD
    J Optom; 2017; 10(3):141-148. PubMed ID: 27639497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of just-noticeable differences for refractive errors and spherical aberration using visual simulation.
    Legras R; Chateau N; Charman WN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):718-28. PubMed ID: 15365392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pilot study: effect of age on visual acuity with defocus and astigmatism.
    Mathur A; Suheimat M; Atchison DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):267-71. PubMed ID: 25479447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of spherical aberration and small-pupil profiles in improving depth of focus for presbyopic corrections.
    Hickenbotham A; Tiruveedhula P; Roorda A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2071-9. PubMed ID: 23031641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Astigmatism impact on visual performance: meridional and adaptational effects.
    Vinas M; de Gracia P; Dorronsoro C; Sawides L; Marin G; Hernández M; Marcos S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Dec; 90(12):1430-42. PubMed ID: 24141632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
    Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Through-focus performance with multifocal contact lenses: effect of binocularity, pupil diameter and inherent ocular aberrations.
    Plainis S; Ntzilepis G; Atchison DA; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23199097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accommodation Responds to Optical Vergence and Not Defocus Blur Alone.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Marín-Franch I; Bernal-Molina P; Esteve-Taboada JJ; Kruger PB; Montés-Micó R; López-Gil N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Mar; 58(3):1758-1763. PubMed ID: 28324117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics.
    Cheng X; Bradley A; Thibos LN
    J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):310-21. PubMed ID: 15134478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.
    Sawides L; de Gracia P; Dorronsoro C; Webster M; Marcos S
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 21712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum amount of astigmatism that should be corrected.
    Villegas EA; Alcón E; Artal P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jan; 40(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 24355718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.