These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31896305)

  • 1. Communicating Commitment: A Relationship-Protection Account of Dyadic Displays on Social Media.
    Krueger KL; Forest AL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 31896305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social Media and Couples: What Are the Important Factors for Understanding Relationship Satisfaction?
    Cole A; Leonard MT; McAuslan P
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2018 Sep; 21(9):582-586. PubMed ID: 30212249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: an exploratory study of emerging adults' perceptions, motives, and behaviors.
    Fox J; Warber KM
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Jan; 16(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 23098273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Couple Who Facebooks Together, Stays Together: Facebook Self-Presentation and Relationship Longevity Among College-Aged Dating Couples.
    Toma CL; Choi M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2015 Jul; 18(7):367-72. PubMed ID: 26167834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facebook or Memory: Which Is the Real Threat to Your Relationship?
    Drouin M; Miller DA; Dibble JL
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2015 Oct; 18(10):561-6. PubMed ID: 26378341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Erotic Use of Social Media Pornography in Gratifying Romantic Relationship Desires.
    Arikewuyo A; Ozad B; Lasisi TT
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E61. PubMed ID: 31875796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why are we together? A dyadic longitudinal investigation of relationship motivation, goal progress, and adjustment.
    Holding AC; Barlow M; Koestner R; Wrosch C
    J Pers; 2020 Jun; 88(3):464-477. PubMed ID: 31420868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dyadic associations between testosterone and relationship quality in couples.
    Edelstein RS; van Anders SM; Chopik WJ; Goldey KL; Wardecker BM
    Horm Behav; 2014 Apr; 65(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 24650800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social Anhedonia and Romantic Relationship Processes.
    Assaad L; Lemay EP
    J Pers; 2018 Apr; 86(2):147-157. PubMed ID: 28002619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facebook and romantic relationships: intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use.
    Hand MM; Thomas D; Buboltz WC; Deemer ED; Buyanjargal M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23101932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facebook use during relationship termination: uncertainty reduction and surveillance.
    Tong ST
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Nov; 16(11):788-93. PubMed ID: 23786171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between body image, sexual satisfaction, and relationship quality in romantic couples.
    van den Brink F; Vollmann M; Smeets MAM; Hessen DJ; Woertman L
    J Fam Psychol; 2018 Jun; 32(4):466-474. PubMed ID: 29517245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship social comparisons in dating and marital relationships: Adding relationship social comparison interpretations.
    Morry MM; Sucharyna TA
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(4):398-416. PubMed ID: 30058945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Don't it make my brown eyes green? An analysis of Facebook use and romantic jealousy.
    Muscanell NL; Guadagno RE; Rice L; Murphy S
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2013 Apr; 16(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23374172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Values in Romantic Relationships.
    van der Wal RC; Litzellachner LF; Karremans JC; Buiter N; Breukel J; Maio GR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jul; 50(7):1066-1079. PubMed ID: 36942922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.
    Joel S; Impett EA; Spielmann SS; MacDonald G
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):805-824. PubMed ID: 30035565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Romantic Relationship Satisfaction and Ambulatory Blood Pressure During Social Interactions: Specificity or Spillover Effects?
    Cornelius T; Birk JL; Edmondson D; Schwartz JE
    Ann Behav Med; 2019 Mar; 53(3):223-231. PubMed ID: 29746629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Pursuit of Romantic Alternatives Online: Social Media Friends as Potential Alternatives.
    Abbasi IS; Alghamdi NG
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2018 Jan; 44(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 28318431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on facebook.
    Fox J; Anderegg C
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2014 Nov; 17(11):685-91. PubMed ID: 25314128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commitment in romantic relationships as a function of partners' encoding of important couple-related memories.
    Guilbault V; Philippe FL
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):595-606. PubMed ID: 27310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.