BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31897316)

  • 1. Determination of Pathogenicity of
    Brown A; Zamanpoor M; Love DR; Prosser DO
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2019 Nov; 19(4):e324-e334. PubMed ID: 31897316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
    Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.
    Hu C; Susswein LR; Roberts ME; Yang H; Marshall ML; Hiraki S; Berkofsky-Fessler W; Gupta S; Shen W; Dunn CA; Huang H; Na J; Domchek SM; Yadav S; Monteiro ANA; Polley EC; Hart SN; Hruska KS; Couch FJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2022 Sep; 28(17):3742-3751. PubMed ID: 35736817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MARGINAL: An Automatic Classification of Variants in
    Karalidou V; Kalfakakou D; Papathanasiou A; Fostira F; Matsopoulos GK
    Biomolecules; 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36358902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.
    Hirotsu Y; Schmidt-Edelkraut U; Nakagomi H; Sakamoto I; Hartenfeller M; Narang R; Soldatos TG; Kaduthanam S; Wang X; Hettich S; Brock S; Jackson DB; Omata M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32486089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good performance of the criteria of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology in prediction of pathogenicity of genetic variants causing thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections.
    Ponińska JK; Bilińska ZT; Truszkowska G; Michalak E; Podgórska A; Stępień-Wojno M; Chmielewski P; Lutyńska A; Płoski R
    J Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 35078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical implications of VUS reclassification in a single-centre series from application of ACMG/AMP classification rules specified for
    Innella G; Ferrari S; Miccoli S; Luppi E; Fortuno C; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Turchetti D
    J Med Genet; 2024 Apr; 61(5):483-489. PubMed ID: 38160042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants.
    Brandt T; Sack LM; Arjona D; Tan D; Mei H; Cui H; Gao H; Bean LJH; Ankala A; Del Gaudio D; Knight Johnson A; Vincent LM; Reavey C; Lai A; Richard G; Meck JM
    Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 31534211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.
    So MK; Jeong TD; Lim W; Moon BI; Paik NS; Kim SC; Huh J
    Breast Cancer; 2019 Jul; 26(4):510-519. PubMed ID: 30725392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2.
    Mighton C; Charames GS; Wang M; Zakoor KR; Wong A; Shickh S; Watkins N; Lebo MS; Bombard Y; Lerner-Ellis J
    Genet Med; 2019 Oct; 21(10):2248-2254. PubMed ID: 30971832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reclassification of
    Lee JS; Oh S; Park SK; Lee MH; Lee JW; Kim SW; Son BH; Noh DY; Lee JE; Park HL; Kim MJ; Cho SI; Lee YK; Park SS; Seong MW
    J Med Genet; 2018 Dec; 55(12):794-802. PubMed ID: 30415210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of a novel pathogenic variant in
    Laraqui A; Cavaillé M; Uhrhammer N; ElBiad O; Bidet Y; El Rhaffouli H; El Anaz H; Rahali DM; Kouach J; Guelzim K; Badaoui B; AlBouzidi A; Oukabli M; Tanz R; Sbitti Y; Ichou M; Ennibi K; Sekhsokh Y; Bignon YJ
    J Genomics; 2021; 9():43-54. PubMed ID: 34646395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
    Richards S; Aziz N; Bale S; Bick D; Das S; Gastier-Foster J; Grody WW; Hegde M; Lyon E; Spector E; Voelkerding K; Rehm HL;
    Genet Med; 2015 May; 17(5):405-24. PubMed ID: 25741868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline CDH1 sequence variants.
    Lee K; Krempely K; Roberts ME; Anderson MJ; Carneiro F; Chao E; Dixon K; Figueiredo J; Ghosh R; Huntsman D; Kaurah P; Kesserwan C; Landrith T; Li S; Mensenkamp AR; Oliveira C; Pardo C; Pesaran T; Richardson M; Slavin TP; Spurdle AB; Trapp M; Witkowski L; Yi CS; Zhang L; Plon SE; Schrader KA; Karam R
    Hum Mutat; 2018 Nov; 39(11):1553-1568. PubMed ID: 30311375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework.
    Tavtigian SV; Greenblatt MS; Harrison SM; Nussbaum RL; Prabhu SA; Boucher KM; Biesecker LG;
    Genet Med; 2018 Sep; 20(9):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 29300386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Under-ascertainment of breast cancer susceptibility gene carriers in a cohort of New Zealand female breast cancer patients.
    Lattimore V; Parsons MT; Spurdle AB; Pearson J; Lehnert K; Sullivan J; Lintott C; Bawden S; Morrin H; Robinson B; Walker L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Feb; 185(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 33113089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of a Novel BRCA1 Pathogenic Mutation in Korean Patients Following Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants According to the ACMG Standards and Guidelines Using Relevant Ethnic Controls.
    Park JS; Nam EJ; Park HS; Han JW; Lee JY; Kim J; Kim TI; Lee ST
    Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Oct; 49(4):1012-1021. PubMed ID: 28111427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BRCA1 and BRCA2 truncating mutations and variants of unknown significance in Egyptian female breast cancer patients.
    AbdelHamid SG; Zekri AN; AbdelAziz HM; El-Mesallamy HO
    Clin Chim Acta; 2021 Jan; 512():66-73. PubMed ID: 33278427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of functional assay data results provides strong evidence for classification of hundreds of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance.
    Lyra PCM; Nepomuceno TC; de Souza MLM; Machado GF; Veloso MF; Henriques TB; Dos Santos DZ; Ribeiro IG; Ribeiro RS; Rangel LBA; Richardson M; Iversen ES; Goldgar D; Couch FJ; Carvalho MA; Monteiro ANA
    Genet Med; 2021 Feb; 23(2):306-315. PubMed ID: 33087888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of ACMG-Guideline-Based Variant Classification of Cancer Susceptibility and Non-Cancer-Associated Genes in Families Affected by Breast Cancer.
    Maxwell KN; Hart SN; Vijai J; Schrader KA; Slavin TP; Thomas T; Wubbenhorst B; Ravichandran V; Moore RM; Hu C; Guidugli L; Wenz B; Domchek SM; Robson ME; Szabo C; Neuhausen SL; Weitzel JN; Offit K; Couch FJ; Nathanson KL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 May; 98(5):801-817. PubMed ID: 27153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.