171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31898104)
1. Feasibility Study of a Novel Protease-Activated Fluorescent Imaging System for Real-Time, Intraoperative Detection of Residual Breast Cancer in Breast Conserving Surgery.
Smith BL; Lanahan CR; Specht MC; Kelly BN; Brown C; Strasfeld DB; Ferrer JM; Rai U; Tang R; Rice-Stitt T; Biernacka A; Brachtel EF; Gadd MA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1854-1861. PubMed ID: 31898104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.
Jia H; Jia W; Yang Y; Li S; Feng H; Liu J; Rao N; Jin L; Wu J; Gu R; Zhu L; Chen K; Deng H; Zeng Y; Liu Q; Song E; Su F
World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 12():289. PubMed ID: 25241216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies.
Schnabel F; Boolbol SK; Gittleman M; Karni T; Tafra L; Feldman S; Police A; Friedman NB; Karlan S; Holmes D; Willey SC; Carmon M; Fernandez K; Akbari S; Harness J; Guerra L; Frazier T; Lane K; Simmons RM; Estabrook A; Allweis T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1589-95. PubMed ID: 24595800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.
Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of margin index as a method for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery in a European cancer center.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Power C; Hill AD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):207-11. PubMed ID: 21638098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients.
Coopey SB; Buckley JM; Smith BL; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3036-40. PubMed ID: 21947583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.
Zysk AM; Chen K; Gabrielson E; Tafra L; May Gonzalez EA; Canner JK; Schneider EB; Cittadine AJ; Scott Carney P; Boppart SA; Tsuchiya K; Sawyer K; Jacobs LK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3356-62. PubMed ID: 26202553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indication for relumpectomy--a useful scoring system in cases of invasive breast cancer.
Halevy A; Lavy R; Pappo I; Davidson T; Gold-Deutch R; Jeroukhimov I; Shapira Z; Wassermann I; Sandbank J; Chikman B
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 105(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 21780127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Margin index: a new method for prediction of residual disease after breast-conserving surgery.
Margenthaler JA; Gao F; Klimberg VS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):2696-701. PubMed ID: 20422459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor.
Wazer DE; Schmidt-Ullrich RK; Ruthazer R; DiPetrillo T; Boyle T; Kanski J; Safaii H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 10571194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
