These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31898164)
1. Exploring the potential impact of relational coherence on persistent rule-following: The first study. Harte C; Barnes-Holmes D; Barnes-Holmes Y; McEnteggart C; Gys J; Hasler C Learn Behav; 2020 Sep; 48(3):373-391. PubMed ID: 31898164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the impact of coherence (through the presence versus absence of feedback) and levels of derivation on persistent rule-following. Harte C; Barnes-Holmes D; Barnes-Holmes Y; McEnteggart C Learn Behav; 2021 Jun; 49(2):222-239. PubMed ID: 32671663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring a Training IRAP as a single participant context for analyzing reversed derived relations and persistent rule-following. Harte C; Barnes-Holmes D; Moreira M; de Almeida JH; Passarelli D; de Rose JC J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Mar; 115(2):460-480. PubMed ID: 33472274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of high versus low levels of derivation for mutually and combinatorially entailed relations on persistent rule-following. Harte C; Barnes-Holmes D; Barnes-Holmes Y; McEnteggart C Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():36-46. PubMed ID: 30165086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Persistent Rule-Following in the Face of Reversed Reinforcement Contingencies: The Differential Impact of Direct Versus Derived Rules. Harte C; Barnes-Holmes Y; Barnes-Holmes D; McEnteggart C Behav Modif; 2017 Nov; 41(6):743-763. PubMed ID: 28639853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relational reasoning with derived comparative relations: a novel model of transitive inference. Munnelly A; Dymond S; Hinton EC Behav Processes; 2010 Sep; 85(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 20595024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facilitation of the equivalence--equivalence responding. Pérez Fernández VJ; García García A; Gómez Bujedo J Psicothema; 2011 Aug; 23(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 21774893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 1-Back reinforcement symbolic-matching by humans: How do they learn it? Zentall TR; Mueller PM; Peng DN Learn Behav; 2023 Sep; 51(3):274-280. PubMed ID: 36597001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple contextual control over non-arbitrary relational responding and a preliminary model of pragmatic verbal analysis. Stewart I; Barrett K; McHugh L; Barnes-Holmes D; O'Hora D J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 23881844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Training and testing for a transformation of fear and avoidance functions via combinatorial entailment using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): Further exploratory analyses. Leech A; Barnes-Holmes D Behav Processes; 2020 Mar; 172():104027. PubMed ID: 31887342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Models of Cognition and Their Applications in Behavioral Economics: A Conceptual Framework for Nudging Derived From Behavior Analysis and Relational Frame Theory. Tagliabue M; Squatrito V; Presti G Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2418. PubMed ID: 31736824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of inference in relational reasoning: Relational matching as a case study. Kroupin IG; Carey SE J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jan; 151(1):224-245. PubMed ID: 35238601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]