These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31898165)

  • 1. Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.
    Reed P
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):254-273. PubMed ID: 31898165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors controlling the micro-structure of human free-operant behaviour: Bout-initiation and within-bout responses are effected by different aspects of the schedule.
    Chen X; Reed P
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jun; 175():104106. PubMed ID: 32209336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human performance on random interval schedules.
    Reed P; Smale D; Owens D; Freegard G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):309-321. PubMed ID: 29985046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of brief mindfulness training on the micro-structure of human free-operant responding: Mindfulness affects stimulus-driven responding.
    Chen X; Reed P
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2023 Jun; 79():101821. PubMed ID: 36813416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of instructions on the microstructure of human schedule performance.
    Chen X; Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 37883012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling bout-pause response patterns in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules using hierarchical Bayesian methodology.
    Matsui H; Yamada K; Sakagami T; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():346-353. PubMed ID: 30059765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the primacy of molecular processes in determining response rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules.
    Tanno T; Sakagami T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jan; 89(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 18338672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent performance as bouts of behavior.
    Smith TT; McLean AP; Shull RL; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jul; 102(1):102-25. PubMed ID: 24861997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.
    Cohen SL; Riley DS; Weigle PA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Sep; 60(2):255-91. PubMed ID: 8409822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20718555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing operant hyperactivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat.
    Hill JC; Herbst K; Sanabria F
    Behav Brain Funct; 2012 Jan; 8():5. PubMed ID: 22277367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice dynamics in concurrent ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Bellow D; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):337-355. PubMed ID: 36718124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Focused-attention mindfulness increases sensitivity to current schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(2):127-137. PubMed ID: 37079826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple determinants of transfer of evaluative function after conditioning with free-operant schedules of reinforcement.
    Dack C; Reed P; McHugh L
    Learn Behav; 2010 Nov; 38(4):348-66. PubMed ID: 21048226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human instrumental performance in ratio and interval contingencies: A challenge for associative theory.
    Pérez OD; Aitken MR; Zhukovsky P; Soto FA; Urcelay GP; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):311-321. PubMed ID: 27894212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Independence of concurrent responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.
    CATANIA AC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1962 Apr; 5(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 13877308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CR
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The copyist model of response emission.
    Tanno T; Silberberg A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):759-78. PubMed ID: 22673925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 17924790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pentobarbital and d-amphetamine effects on concurrent performances.
    Bacotti AV
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 429957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.