These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31898544)
1. Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol. Görlach MG; Schrage T; Bokemeyer C; Kröger N; Müller V; Petersen C; Betz CS; Krüll A; Schulz H; Bleich C Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 31898544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a Short Instrument for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncological Patients for Clinical Use: Protocol for an Observational Study. Schrage T; Görlach M; Betz CS; Bokemeyer C; Kröger N; Mueller V; Petersen C; Krüll A; Schulz H; Bleich C JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 Jul; 9(7):e17854. PubMed ID: 32726289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing an e-learning course on the use of PRO measures in oncological practice: health care professionals' preferences for learning content and methods. Sztankay M; Wintner LM; Roggendorf S; Nordhausen T; Dirven L; Taphoorn MJB; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Velikova G; Bottomley A; Kulis D; Kachel T; Schmidt H; Support Care Cancer; 2022 Mar; 30(3):2555-2567. PubMed ID: 34797424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Could existing infrastructure for using patient-reported outcomes as quality measures also be used for individual care in patients with colorectal cancer? Breidenbach C; Kowalski C; Wesselmann S; Sibert NT BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 May; 21(1):448. PubMed ID: 33975586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PATIENT VOICES, a project for the integration of the systematic assessment of patient reported outcomes and experiences within a comprehensive cancer center: a protocol for a mixed method feasibility study. Brunelli C; Borreani C; Caraceni A; Roli A; Bellazzi M; Lombi L; Zito E; Pellegrini C; Spada P; Kaasa S; Foschi AM; Apolone G; Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 32723341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of patient-reported outcomes for symptom management in oncology practice through the SIMPRO research consortium: a protocol for a pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation multi-center cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial. Hassett MJ; Wong S; Osarogiagbon RU; Bian J; Dizon DS; Jenkins HH; Uno H; Cronin C; Schrag D; Trials; 2022 Jun; 23(1):506. PubMed ID: 35710449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An implementation study of electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes in inpatient radiation oncology. Nordhausen T; Lampe K; Vordermark D; Holzner B; Al-Ali HK; Meyer G; Schmidt H J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Jul; 6(1):77. PubMed ID: 35852715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine head and neck cancer care: What do health professionals perceive as barriers and facilitators? Nguyen H; Butow P; Dhillon H; Morris L; Brown A; West K; Sundaresan P J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 64(5):704-710. PubMed ID: 32394587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure Clinic: A Qualitative Assessment. Brown-Johnson C; Calma J; Amano A; Winget M; Harris SR; Vilendrer S; Asch SM; Heidenreich P; Sandhu AT; Kalwani NM Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2023 May; 16(5):e009677. PubMed ID: 37114990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a hospital-based patient-reported outcome framework for lung cancer patients: a study protocol. Moloczij N; Gough K; Solomon B; Ball D; Mileshkin L; Duffy M; Krishnasamy M Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 29325571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicians' knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care - insights from qualitative interviews. Sibert NT; Kowalski C; Pfaff H; Wesselmann S; Breidenbach C BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Apr; 21(1):366. PubMed ID: 33879141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability. Girgis A; Durcinoska I; Levesque JV; Gerges M; Sandell T; Arnold A; Delaney GP; J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e330. PubMed ID: 28970188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany. Kusch M; Labouvie H; Schiewer V; Talalaev N; Cwik JC; Bussmann S; Vaganian L; Gerlach AL; Dresen A; Cecon N; Salm S; Krieger T; Pfaff H; Lemmen C; Derendorf L; Stock S; Samel C; Hagemeier A; Hellmich M; Leicher B; Hültenschmidt G; Swoboda J; Haas P; Arning A; Göttel A; Schwickerath K; Graeven U; Houwaart S; Kerek-Bodden H; Krebs S; Muth C; Hecker C; Reiser M; Mauch C; Benner J; Schmidt G; Karlowsky C; Vimalanandan G; Matyschik L; Galonska L; Francke A; Osborne K; Nestle U; Bäumer M; Schmitz K; Wolf J; Hallek M BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Apr; 22(1):543. PubMed ID: 35459202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol. Jenniches I; Lemmen C; Cwik JC; Kusch M; Labouvie H; Scholten N; Gerlach A; Stock S; Samel C; Hagemeier A; Hellmich M; Haas P; Hallek M; Pfaff H; Dresen A BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034141. PubMed ID: 32156765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries. Van Der Wees PJ; Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MW; Ayanian JZ; Black N; Westert GP; Schneider EC Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):754-75. PubMed ID: 25492603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocol for a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study expanding, implementing and evaluating electronic health record-integrated patient-reported symptom monitoring in a multisite cancer centre. Garcia SF; Smith JD; Kallen M; Webster KA; Lyleroehr M; Kircher S; Bass M; Cella D; Penedo FJ BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e059563. PubMed ID: 35504641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies. Stover AM; Tompkins Stricker C; Hammelef K; Henson S; Carr P; Jansen J; Deal AM; Bennett AV; Basch EM Med Care; 2019 May; 57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1():S92-S99. PubMed ID: 30985602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care. Nguyen H; Butow P; Dhillon H; Sundaresan P J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 68(2):186-195. PubMed ID: 32815314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Quality Oncology Practice Initiative-Registered Practices: Results of a National Survey. Zhang B; Lloyd W; Jahanzeb M; Hassett MJ J Oncol Pract; 2018 Oct; 14(10):e602-e611. PubMed ID: 30207853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]