BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31899454)

  • 1. Applicability of the User Engagement Scale to Mobile Health: A Survey-Based Quantitative Study.
    Holdener M; Gut A; Angerer A
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jan; 8(1):e13244. PubMed ID: 31899454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.
    Lau N; O'Daffer A; Yi-Frazier JP; Rosenberg AR
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jul; 9(7):e29689. PubMed ID: 34259639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.
    Muro-Culebras A; Escriche-Escuder A; Martin-Martin J; Roldán-Jiménez C; De-Torres I; Ruiz-Muñoz M; Gonzalez-Sanchez M; Mayoral-Cleries F; Biró A; Tang W; Nikolova B; Salvatore A; Cuesta-Vargas AI
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Dec; 9(12):e15433. PubMed ID: 34855618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of Smartphone User-Centered Mobile Health Tracking Apps Across Various Chronic Illness Populations: An Integrative Review.
    Birkhoff SD; Smeltzer SC
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2017 Jul; 49(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28605151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Quality of Mobile Phone Apps for Weight Management: User-Centered Study With Employees From a Lebanese University.
    Bardus M; Ali A; Demachkieh F; Hamadeh G
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e9836. PubMed ID: 30672742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usability Challenges for Health and Wellness Mobile Apps: Mixed-Methods Study Among mHealth Experts and Consumers.
    Liew MS; Zhang J; See J; Ong YL
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e12160. PubMed ID: 30698528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. German Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire in a Cohort of Patients With Cancer: Translation and Validation Study.
    Moorthy P; Weinert L; Harms BC; Anders C; Siegel F
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 10():e51090. PubMed ID: 37910144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adults' Preferences for Behavior Change Techniques and Engagement Features in a Mobile App to Promote 24-Hour Movement Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
    DeSmet A; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Chastin S; Crombez G; Maddison R; Cardon G
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e15707. PubMed ID: 31859680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients and Stakeholders' Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study.
    Alhammad N; Alajlani M; Abd-Alrazaq A; Arvanitis T; Epiphaniou G
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 May; 13():e54933. PubMed ID: 38776540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder.
    Nicholas J; Fogarty AS; Boydell K; Christensen H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Apr; 19(4):e105. PubMed ID: 28389420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-World Evidence of User Engagement With Mobile Health for Diabetes Management: Longitudinal Observational Study.
    Böhm AK; Jensen ML; Sørensen MR; Stargardt T
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e22212. PubMed ID: 32975198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Continued Use of Mobile Health Apps: Insights From a Longitudinal Study.
    Vaghefi I; Tulu B
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Aug; 7(8):e12983. PubMed ID: 31469081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adoption of Mobile Health Apps in Dietetic Practice: Case Study of Diyetkolik.
    Akdur G; Aydin MN; Akdur G
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Oct; 8(10):e16911. PubMed ID: 33006566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malay Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (M-MAUQ): Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.
    Mustafa N; Safii NS; Jaffar A; Sani NS; Mohamad MI; Abd Rahman AH; Mohd Sidik S
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Feb; 9(2):e24457. PubMed ID: 33538704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chinese Version of the Mobile Health App Usability Questionnaire: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study.
    Shan Y; Ji M; Xie W; Li R; Qian X; Zhang X; Hao T
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jul; 6(7):e37933. PubMed ID: 35793132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A feature-oriented analysis of developers' descriptions and user reviews of top mHealth applications for diabetes and hypertension.
    Wang S; Lee HS; Choi W
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Dec; 156():104598. PubMed ID: 34624662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.
    Maramba I; Chatterjee A; Newman C
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Jun; 126():95-104. PubMed ID: 31029270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Questionnaire for Assessing User Satisfaction With Mobile Health Apps: Development Using Rasch Measurement Theory.
    Melin J; Bonn SE; Pendrill L; Trolle Lagerros Y
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e15909. PubMed ID: 32452817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.
    Zhou L; Bao J; Watzlaf V; Parmanto B
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e11223. PubMed ID: 30990458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commercially Available Apps to Support Healthy Family Meals: User Testing of App Utility, Acceptability, and Engagement.
    Mauch CE; Laws RA; Prichard I; Maeder AJ; Wycherley TP; Golley RK
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e22990. PubMed ID: 33960951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.