310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31899840)
1. Evaluation of HoloHuman augmented reality application as a novel educational tool in dentistry.
Zafar S; Zachar JJ
Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 May; 24(2):259-265. PubMed ID: 31899840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedagogical development in local anaesthetic training in paediatric dentistry using virtual reality simulator.
Zafar S; Siddiqi A; Yasir M; Zachar JJ
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Aug; 22(4):667-674. PubMed ID: 33566287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Cercenelli L; De Stefano A; Billi AM; Ruggeri A; Marcelli E; Marchetti C; Manzoli L; Ratti S; Badiali G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomy meets dentistry! Linking anatomy and clinical practice in the preclinical dental curriculum.
Rafai N; Lemos M; Kennes LN; Hawari A; Gerhardt-Szép S; Classen-Linke I
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):305. PubMed ID: 27887620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Augmented Reality in Gross Anatomy Teaching: A Quantitative and Qualitative Pilot Study.
Bork F; Lehner A; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Sep; 14(5):590-604. PubMed ID: 32892494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissecting human anatomy learning process through anatomical education with augmented reality: AEducAR 2.0, an updated interdisciplinary study.
Neri I; Cercenelli L; Marcuccio M; Lodi S; Koufi FD; Fazio A; Marvi MV; Marcelli E; Billi AM; Ruggeri A; Tarsitano A; Manzoli L; Badiali G; Ratti S
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):693-711. PubMed ID: 38520153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental trauma simulation training using a novel 3D printed tooth model.
Zafar S; Renner MP; Zachar JJ
Dent Traumatol; 2020 Dec; 36(6):641-647. PubMed ID: 32677313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.
Bork F; Stratmann L; Enssle S; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):585-598. PubMed ID: 30697948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy.
Moro C; Štromberga Z; Raikos A; Stirling A
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 28419750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Student perceptions and effectiveness of an innovative learning tool: Anatomy Glove Learning System.
Lisk K; McKee P; Baskwill A; Agur AM
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 24757171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neuroanatomy Learning: Augmented Reality vs. Cross-Sections.
Henssen DJHA; van den Heuvel L; De Jong G; Vorstenbosch MATM; van Cappellen van Walsum AM; Van den Hurk MM; Kooloos JGM; Bartels RHMA
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 May; 13(3):353-365. PubMed ID: 31269322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students.
Azer SA; Eizenberg N
Surg Radiol Anat; 2007 Mar; 29(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 17318286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of High-Definition Audiovisual Technology in a Gross Anatomy Laboratory: Effect on Dental Students' Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction.
Ahmad M; Sleiman NH; Thomas M; Kashani N; Ditmyer MM
J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 26834129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced cadaver-specific computed tomography in gross anatomy teaching.
Paech D; Klopries K; Doll S; Nawrotzki R; Schlemmer HP; Giesel FL; Kuner T
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2838-2844. PubMed ID: 29383525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harnessing Augmented Reality and CT to Teach First-Year Medical Students Head and Neck Anatomy.
Weeks JK; Pakpoor J; Park BJ; Robinson NJ; Rubinstein NA; Prouty SM; Nachiappan AC
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):871-876. PubMed ID: 32828663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Undergraduate dental students' perceptions of head and neck anatomy teaching in Australia.
Hassan NM; Akhter R; Al-Aubaidy H; Flatau A
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e337-e342. PubMed ID: 29091339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of pre-clinical instructional technologies: Natural teeth, 3D models, 3D printing, and augmented reality.
Mahrous A; Elgreatly A; Qian F; Schneider GB
J Dent Educ; 2021 Nov; 85(11):1795-1801. PubMed ID: 34216032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
