These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31899898)

  • 1. Grasp force estimation from the transient EMG using high-density surface recordings.
    Martinez IJR; Mannini A; Clemente F; Sabatini AM; Cipriani C
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Feb; 17(1):016052. PubMed ID: 31899898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online Grasp Force Estimation From the Transient EMG.
    Martinez IJR; Mannini A; Clemente F; Cipriani C
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Oct; 28(10):2333-2341. PubMed ID: 32894718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of Transient Myoelectric Signals for the Control of Multi-Grasp Hand Prostheses.
    Kanitz G; Cipriani C; Edin BB
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Sep; 26(9):1756-1764. PubMed ID: 30072331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of the Teager-Kaiser Energy Operator in an autonomous burst detector to create onset and offset profiles of forearm muscles during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Krabben T; Prange GB; Kobus HJ; Rietman JS; Buurke JH
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2016; 18(4):135-144. PubMed ID: 28133386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-session and inter-day reliability of forearm surface EMG during varying hand grip forces.
    Hashemi Oskouei A; Paulin MG; Carman AB
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Feb; 23(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 22999075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of handgrip forces using surface EMG of forearm muscles.
    Hoozemans MJ; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 15811606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing two methods to record maximal voluntary contractions and different electrode positions in recordings of forearm extensor muscle activity: Refining risk assessments for work-related wrist disorders.
    Dahlqvist C; Nordander C; Granqvist L; Forsman M; Hansson GÅ
    Work; 2018; 59(2):231-242. PubMed ID: 29355119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hysteresis in the electromyography-force relationship: toward an optimal model for the estimation of force.
    Kamavuako EN; Rosenvang JC
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Nov; 46(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 22996311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two degrees of freedom, dynamic, hand-wrist EMG-force using a minimum number of electrodes.
    Dai C; Zhu Z; Martinez-Luna C; Hunt TR; Farrell TR; Clancy EA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2019 Aug; 47():10-18. PubMed ID: 31009829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extracting signals robust to electrode number and shift for online simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control by factorization algorithms.
    Muceli S; Jiang N; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 May; 22(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 24132017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating protocols for normalizing forearm electromyograms during power grip.
    Ngo BP; Wells RP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Feb; 26():66-72. PubMed ID: 26589588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of muscle strength during motion recognition using multichannel surface EMG signals.
    Nagata K; Nakano T; Magatani K; Yamada M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():351-4. PubMed ID: 19162665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fatigue-independent alterations in muscle activation and effort perception during forearm exercise: role of local oxygen delivery.
    Drouin PJ; Kohoko ZIN; Mew OK; Lynn MJT; Fenuta AM; Tschakovsky ME
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2019 Jul; 127(1):111-121. PubMed ID: 31070953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of forearm's motions by surface EMG signals using neural network.
    Itakura N; Kinbara Y; Fuwa T; Sakamoto K
    Appl Human Sci; 1996 Nov; 15(6):287-94. PubMed ID: 9008983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of muscle activation during different walking speeds with two mathematical approaches compared to surface EMG.
    Trinler U; Leboeuf F; Hollands K; Jones R; Baker R
    Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():266-273. PubMed ID: 29966908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of grasping force from features of intramuscular EMG signals with mirrored bilateral training.
    Kamavuako EN; Farina D; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 22006428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in muscle geometry during forearm pronation and supination and their relationships to EMG cross-correlation measures.
    Yung M; Wells RP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Jun; 23(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 23369877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal strategy of sEMG feature and measurement position for grasp force estimation.
    Wu C; Cao Q; Fei F; Yang D; Xu B; Zhang G; Zeng H; Song A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247883. PubMed ID: 33784334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The type of visual biofeedback influences maximal handgrip strength and activation strategies.
    Marcel-Millet P; Gimenez P; Groslambert A; Ravier G; Grospretre S
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2021 Jun; 121(6):1607-1616. PubMed ID: 33649937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term decoding of movement force and direction with a wireless myoelectric implant.
    Morel P; Ferrea E; Taghizadeh-Sarshouri B; Audí JM; Ruff R; Hoffmann KP; Lewis S; Russold M; Dietl H; Abu-Saleh L; Schroeder D; Krautschneider W; Meiners T; Gail A
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016002. PubMed ID: 26643959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.