224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31900511)
41. Sonoelastography of Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Masses: A Pilot Study of Quantitative Evaluation.
Pass B; Johnson M; Hensor EM; Gupta H; Robinson P
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2209-16. PubMed ID: 27663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cyst-like solid tumors of the musculoskeletal system: an analysis of ultrasound findings.
Lee MH; Kim NR; Ryu JA
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(10):981-6. PubMed ID: 20186412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The use of point of care ultrasound in the evaluation of pediatric soft tissue neck masses.
Levine MC; Arroyo A; Likourezos A; Homel P; Dickman E
Am J Emerg Med; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1466-1469. PubMed ID: 30389115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Use of strain ratio in evaluating superficial soft tissue tumors on ultrasonic elastography.
Lee YH; Song HT; Suh JS
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Jul; 41(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 27277905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Benign vs malignant soft tissue neoplasms: limitations of magnetic resonance imaging.
Sen J; Agarwal S; Singh S; Sen R; Goel S
Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 20587903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Sonographic evaluation of palpable superficial masses.
DiDomenico P; Middleton W
Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 52(6):1295-305. PubMed ID: 25444107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Diagnostic value of tumor-fascia relationship in superficial soft tissue masses on magnetic resonance imaging.
Iwai T; Hoshi M; Oebisu N; Aono M; Takami M; Ieguchi M; Nakamura H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209642. PubMed ID: 30596710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Pseudotumoral soft tissue masses in children and adolescents].
Papillard-Maréchal S; Brisse HJ; Pannier S; Ilharreborde B; Philippe-Chomette P; Irtan S; Thevenin-Lemoine C; Cellier C; Freneaux P; Klijanienko J; Orbach D
Arch Pediatr; 2015 Jan; 22(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25435271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Diagnostic value and accuracy of imprint cytology evaluation during image-guided core needle biopsies: Review of our experience at a large academic center.
Kubik MJ; Bovbel A; Goli H; Saremian J; Siddiqi A; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Oct; 43(10):773-9. PubMed ID: 26119885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Non Lipomatous Benign Lesions Mimicking Soft-tissue Sarcomas: A Pictorial Essay.
Coran A; Orsatti G; Crimì F; Rastrelli M; DI Maggio A; Ponzoni A; Attar S; Stramare R
In Vivo; 2018; 32(2):221-229. PubMed ID: 29475903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Sonographically guided percutaneous needle biopsy of soft tissue masses with histopathologic correlation.
Soudack M; Nachtigal A; Vladovski E; Brook O; Gaitini D
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1271-7; quiz 1278-9. PubMed ID: 16998099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The pitfalls of ultrasonography in the evaluation of soft tissue masses.
Kwok HC; Pinto CH; Doyle AJ
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Oct; 56(5):519-24. PubMed ID: 23043570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Small indeterminate superficial soft tissue masses: relationship between depth and histological grade.
Khoo M; Pressney I; Gerrand C; Saifuddin A
Br J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 93(1110):20191037. PubMed ID: 32108489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Does size reliably predict malignancy in soft tissue tumours?
Gruber L; Loizides A; Ostermann L; Glodny B; Plaikner M; Gruber H
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4640-4648. PubMed ID: 26960540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The spectrum of vascularized superficial soft-tissue tumors on sonography with a histopathologic correlation: Part 1, benign tumors.
Jin W; Kim GY; Park SY; Chun YS; Nam DH; Park JS; Ryu KN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):439-45. PubMed ID: 20651202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EUS elastography for discriminating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, single-center study.
Dawwas MF; Taha H; Leeds JS; Nayar MK; Oppong KW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Nov; 76(5):953-61. PubMed ID: 22854060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Computer-aided diagnosis of soft tissue tumors on high-resolution ultrasonography with geometrical and morphological features.
Chen CY; Chiou HJ; Chou YH; Chiou SY; Wang HK; Chou SY; Chiang HK
Acad Radiol; 2009 May; 16(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 19345903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
