These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31900637)
21. Parker Flex-It intubation stylet versus a 90-degree curved stylet during intubation with the McGrath videolaryngoscope performed by novices: a manikin study with 5 airway scenarios. Reus E; Grundmann U; Liening K; Wrobel M J Clin Anesth; 2013 Dec; 25(8):624-8. PubMed ID: 23988799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Orotracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients, comparison of GlideScope(®) video laryngoscope and the LMA CTrach™ with direct laryngoscopy. Yousef GT; Abdalgalil DA; Ibrahim TH Anesth Essays Res; 2012; 6(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 25885612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survey of airway management strategies and experience of non-consultant doctors in intensive care units in the UK. Astin J; King EC; Bradley T; Bellchambers E; Cook TM Br J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 109(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 22874651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A national survey of videolaryngoscopes and alternative intubation devices in Hungary. Nagy B; Rendeki S PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223645. PubMed ID: 31600304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison between bougies and stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope. Batuwitage B; McDonald A; Nishikawa K; Lythgoe D; Mercer S; Charters P Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):400-5. PubMed ID: 24675430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of capnography and the availability of airway equipment on Intensive Care Units in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Georgiou AP; Gouldson S; Amphlett AM Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 20337619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in predicted difficult airway: a feasibility study. Vargas M; Pastore A; Aloj F; Laffey JG; Servillo G BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28219331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Post-intensive care syndrome screening: a French multicentre survey. Agbakou M; Combet M; Martin M; Blonz G; Desmedt L; Seguin A; Lemarié J; Zambon O; Reignier J; Lascarrou JB; Ehrmann S; Canet E Ann Intensive Care; 2024 Jul; 14(1):109. PubMed ID: 38980434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [McGRATH MAC Videolaryngoscope: clinical assessment of its performance in 50 surgical patients]. Negishi Y; Shimada N; Urayama M; Niwa Y; Takeuchi M Masui; 2014 Sep; 63(9):1025-8. PubMed ID: 25255665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope--an initial clinical evaluation. Shippey B; Ray D; McKeown D Can J Anaesth; 2007 Apr; 54(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 17400984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Shikani optical stylet as an alternative to the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult intubations--a randomised controlled trial. Phua DS; Mah CL; Wang CF Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 22324890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the Pentax AirwayScope and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with a normal airway. Lee J; Kwak HJ; Lee JY; Chang MY; Lee SY; Kim JY Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Nov; 96(46):e8713. PubMed ID: 29145308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A mannequin study of intubation with the AP advance and GlideScope Ranger videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Hodd JA; Doyle DJ; Gupta S; Dalton JE; Cata JP; Brewer EJ; James M; Sessler DI Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 21890882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade Ömür D; Bayram B; Özbilgin Ş; Hancı V; Kuvaki B Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2017; 67(5):450-456. PubMed ID: 28526471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Airway management in intensive care units in Rhineland-Palatinate : Evolution over five years]. Piepho T; Härer T; Ellermann L; Noppens RR Anaesthesist; 2017 May; 66(5):333-339. PubMed ID: 28194479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. McElwain J; Malik MA; Harte BH; Flynn NM; Laffey JG Anaesthesia; 2010 May; 65(5):483-9. PubMed ID: 20337620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of intubation conditions with CMAC Miller videolaryngoscope and conventional Miller laryngoscope in lateral position in infants: A prospective randomized trial. Jain D; Mehta S; Gandhi K; Arora S; Parikh B; Abas M Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 28(3):226-230. PubMed ID: 29316004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A United Kingdom national obstetric intubation equipment survey. Bullough AS; Carraretto M Int J Obstet Anesth; 2009 Oct; 18(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 19625180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]