These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31900637)
61. McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: the randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol. Bailly A; Lascarrou JB; Le Thuaut A; Boisrame-Helms J; Kamel T; Mercier E; Ricard JD; Lemiale V; Champigneulle B; Reignier J; BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e009855. PubMed ID: 26700287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Fiberscope Assisted Videolaryngoscope Intubation in the Surgical Treatment of TMJ Ankylosis. Gupta A; Kapoor D; Awana M; Lehl G J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Jun; 14(2):484-6. PubMed ID: 26028881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The use of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope for awake intubation in patients with a predicted extremely difficult airway: case series. Gaszyński T Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2018; 14():539-542. PubMed ID: 29559790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Comparison of the glottic view during video-intubation in super obese patients: a series of cases. Gaszyński T Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2016; 12():1677-1682. PubMed ID: 27956835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Postoperative sore throat and subglottic injury after McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation with versus without a stylet in patients with a high Mallampati score: a randomized controlled trial. Yoon HK; Lee HC; Oh H; Jun K; Park HP BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):137. PubMed ID: 31366325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. McGrath videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Hoshijima H; Mihara T; Maruyama K; Denawa Y; Takahashi M; Shiga T; Nagasaka H J Clin Anesth; 2018 May; 46():25-32. PubMed ID: 29414609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Glottiscopes and videolaryngoscopes: a rational choice?]. Laffon M; Thévenin A; Mille Zemmoura B Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Dec; 32(12):e211-5. PubMed ID: 24246658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Airway Management in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Survey of Two Regions in China. Zhang S; Lin J; Diao X; Shi W; Huang L Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():4653494. PubMed ID: 36452062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A new difficult airway management algorithm based upon the El Ganzouri Risk Index and GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. A new look for intubation? Caldiroli D; Cortellazzi P Minerva Anestesiol; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1011-7. PubMed ID: 21610665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Laryngoscopes for difficult airway scenarios: a comparison of the available devices. Szarpak L Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):631-643. PubMed ID: 30099914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Emergency Intubation outside Operating Room/Intensive Care Unit Settings: Are We Following the Recommendations for Safe Practice? Kajal K; Hazarika A; Reddy S; Jain K; Meena SC Anesth Essays Res; 2018; 12(4):865-872. PubMed ID: 30662122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Practices During Intubation in COVID-19 Intensive Care Units in India: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Survey. Panda CK; Singha SK; Karim HMR; Mishra M Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e34424. PubMed ID: 36874758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in the management of unexpected failed intubations. Kilicaslan A; Topal A; Tavlan A; Erol A; Otelcioglu S Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 24565390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway using Boedeker intubation forceps and McGrath videolaryngoscope. Strøm C; Barnung S; Kristensen MS; Bøttger M; Tvede MF; Rasmussen LS Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Oct; 59(9):1154-60. PubMed ID: 25982220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparison of the Pentax Airway Scope and McGrath Videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation by anaesthetists unfamiliar with videolaryngoscopes: a manikin study. Sharma DJ; Weightman WM; Travis A Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Jan; 38(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 20191775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Strategies to prevent airway complications: a survey of adult intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. Husain T; Gatward JJ; Hambidge OR; Asogan M; Southwood TJ Br J Anaesth; 2012 May; 108(5):800-6. PubMed ID: 22416062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Nasotracheal intubation in a difficult airway using the Storz C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, the Boedeker Bougie endotracheal introducer, and the Boedeker curved forceps. Nicholas TA; Bernhagen MA; Boedeker BH Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 173():310-2. PubMed ID: 22357008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. Xue FS; Zhang GH; Li XY; Sun HT; Li P; Sun HY; Xu YC; Liu Y Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jun; 23(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 16507195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Utilization of a Glidescope videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubations in different emergency airway management settings. Lim HC; Goh SH Eur J Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 16(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 18832996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Comparison of the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen tube intubation. Hsu HT; Chou SH; Wu PJ; Tseng KY; Kuo YW; Chou CY; Cheng KI Anaesthesia; 2012 Apr; 67(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 22324297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]