These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31900870)

  • 1. Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes.
    Hara Y; Machida S; Ebihara S; Ishizuka M; Tada A; Nishimura T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 64(2):114-126. PubMed ID: 31900870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.
    Ortiz G; Drucker D; Hyde C; Staffetti J; Kremers J; Tzekov R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31571069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
    Kirkiewicz M; Lubiński W; Penkala K
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26831670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regional variations in correlation between photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms and ganglion cell complex in glaucoma.
    Machida S; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Apr; 40(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24871085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alterations of photopic negative response of multifocal electroretinogram in patients with glaucoma.
    Kaneko M; Machida S; Hoshi Y; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jan; 40(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 24832792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical application of photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open-angle Glaucoma.
    Huang L; Shen X; Fan N; He J
    Eye Sci; 2012 Sep; 27(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 22993054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage.
    Colotto A; Falsini B; Salgarello T; Iarossi G; Galan ME; Scullica L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2205-11. PubMed ID: 10892864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms and local loss of retinal neurons in glaucoma.
    Tamada K; Machida S; Oikawa T; Miyamoto H; Nishimura T; Kurosaka D
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Feb; 35(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 20136426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On- and off-response ERGs elicited by sawtooth stimuli in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Pangeni G; Lämmer R; Tornow RP; Horn FK; Kremers J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 124(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 22457046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significant correlations between photopic negative response, afferent pupillary defect, and mean defects of visual fields in asymmetric optic nerve disorders.
    Okuno T; Kida T; Ikeda T; Oku H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 258(8):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 32080769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.
    Wang J; Cheng H; Hu YS; Tang RA; Frishman LJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23. PubMed ID: 22273726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of multifocal photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
    Al-Nosairy KO; Thieme H; Hoffmann MB
    Exp Eye Res; 2020 Nov; 200():108242. PubMed ID: 32926894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of photopic negative response of focal electoretinogram to detect glaucomatous eyes.
    Machida S; Tamada K; Oikawa T; Yokoyama D; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 94(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 19692386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of inner retinal function at different stages of primary open angle glaucoma using the photopic negative response (PhNR) measured by RETeval electroretinography.
    Hidaka T; Chuman H; Ikeda Y
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jan; 262(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 37535182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of broadband and monochromatic stimuli on the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram in normal subjects and in open-angle glaucoma patients.
    Sustar M; Cvenkel B; Brecelj J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 118(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 18932006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between visual acuity and retinal structures measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in patients with open-angle glaucoma.
    Kim JH; Lee HS; Kim NR; Seong GJ; Kim CY
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jul; 55(8):4801-11. PubMed ID: 25034596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between N2 amplitude of multifocal ERGs and retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucomatous eyes.
    Kato F; Miura G; Shirato S; Sato E; Yamamoto S
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 131(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 26521929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.