143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31901058)
1. Online platforms and social networks for the creation of research profiles.
López-Hermoso C; Gil-Navarro MV; Abdel-Kader-Martín L; Santos-Ramos B
Farm Hosp; 2020 Jan; 44(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 31901058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama].
La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A
Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.
Gasparyan AY; Nurmashev B; Yessirkepov M; Endovitskiy DA; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1749-1756. PubMed ID: 28960025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Presence of Norwegian Scholars on Academic Network Sites--Where and Who Are They?
Mikki S; Zygmuntowska M; Gjesdal ØL; Al Ruwehy HA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142709. PubMed ID: 26565408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].
Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E
Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inconsistency in Automated Reports of Scientific Productivity and Impact in Academic Plastic Surgery.
Plana NM; Massie JP; Bekisz JM; Fryml EM; Spore S; Diaz-Siso JR; Flores RL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Mar; 141(3):432e-438e. PubMed ID: 29485578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Bibliometrics and web use: the birth of altmetrics].
Scotti V
Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Apr; 106(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 25959890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Part II: Should the h-index be modified? An analysis of the m-quotient, contemporary h-index, authorship value, and impact factor.
Khan NR; Thompson CJ; Taylor DR; Gabrick KS; Choudhri AF; Boop FR; Klimo P
World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):766-74. PubMed ID: 23886815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of author identifier services (ORCID, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen Normandy (France): A case study.
Boudry C; Durand-Barthez M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238583. PubMed ID: 32877458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication.
Durieux V; Gevenois PA
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 20413749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The long pilgrimage of Spanish biomedical journals toward excellence. Who helps? Quality, impact and research merit].
Alfonso F
Endocrinol Nutr; 2010 Mar; 57(3):110-20. PubMed ID: 20347618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic and open identification of researchers and authors: focus on open researcher and contributor ID.
Gasparyan AY; Akazhanov NA; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1453-6. PubMed ID: 25408574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do bibliometric findings differ between Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Science? Bibliometry of publications after oral presentation to the 2013 and 2014 French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Congresses.
Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Antoni M; Devos P; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1469-1473. PubMed ID: 33153959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with International Orthopaedics.
Scarlat MM; Mavrogenis AF; Pećina M; Niculescu M
Int Orthop; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 25947897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Half a century of ANALES DE PEDIATRÍA. Evolution of its main bibliometric indicators in the Web of Science and Scopus international databases].
González de Dios J; Alonso-Arroyo A; Aleixandre-Benavent R
An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2019 Mar; 90(3):194.e1-194.e11. PubMed ID: 30777718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the scientific activity through bibliometric indices].
Bordons M; Zulueta MA
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1999 Oct; 52(10):790-800. PubMed ID: 10563155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bibliometric indexes, databases and impact factors in cardiology.
Bienert IR; Oliveira RC; Andrade PB; Caramori CA
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc; 2015; 30(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 26107458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history.
Baneyx A
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):363-71. PubMed ID: 19043670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Scientometric Analysis of Medical Research Output.
Masic I; Begic E; Begic N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 238():246-249. PubMed ID: 28679935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators.
Heneberg P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153730. PubMed ID: 27088862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
