These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31901058)

  • 41. Use of scientific social networking to improve the research strategies of PubMed readers.
    Evdokimov P; Kudryavtsev A; Ilgisonis E; Ponomarenko E; Lisitsa A
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Feb; 9():113. PubMed ID: 26892337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics.
    Powell KR; Peterson SR
    Nurs Outlook; 2017; 65(5):572-578. PubMed ID: 28377037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Bibliometric indicators for evaluation of research work. 2. Citations and their analysis].
    Petrak J
    Lijec Vjesn; 2001; 123(5-6):129-34. PubMed ID: 11554113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A bibliometric analysis of scientific production on atypical antipsychotic drugs from Italy.
    López-Muñoz F; De Berardis D; Fornaro M; Vellante F; di Giannantonio M; Povedano-Montero FJ; Póveda Fernández-Martín M; Rubio G; Álamo C
    Riv Psichiatr; 2017; 52(6):236-246. PubMed ID: 29343873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context.
    Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Duisenova A; Trukhachev VI; Kostyukova EI; Kitas GD
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Apr; 33(18):e139. PubMed ID: 29713258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Analysis of scientific production and bibliometric impact of a group of Spanish clinical researchers].
    Miró O; Burbano Santos P; Trilla A; Casademont J; Fernandez Pérez C; Martín-Sánchez F
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2016; 39(2):213-25. PubMed ID: 27599949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Rating and ranking the role of bibliometrics and webometrics in nursing and midwifery.
    Davidson PM; Newton PJ; Ferguson C; Daly J; Elliott D; Homer C; Duffield C; Jackson D
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():135812. PubMed ID: 24550691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Scientific research and academic promotion in occupational medicine: what are the rules of the game?].
    Franco G
    Med Lav; 2011; 102(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 21485054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [The iberoamerican scientific production in nutritional sciences: the indexation in PubMed and Google Scholar].
    Franco-Pérez AM; Sanz-Valero J; Wanden-Berghe C; Melian-Fleitas L
    Nutr Hosp; 2014 Nov; 30(5):1165-72. PubMed ID: 25365023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Measuring the social impact of nursing research: An insight into altmetrics.
    Dardas LA; Woodward A; Scott J; Xu H; Sawair FA
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Jul; 75(7):1394-1405. PubMed ID: 30507052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [New bibliometric indicators. Is this the end of the impact factor era?].
    Berhidi A; Szluka P; Vasas L
    Magy Onkol; 2009 Jun; 53(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 19581177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. What Effect Does Self-Citation Have on Bibliometric Measures in Academic Plastic Surgery?
    Swanson EW; Miller DT; Susarla SM; Lopez J; Lough DM; May JW; Redett RJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Sep; 77(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 26101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Brief report on academic contributions from China on the topic of rheumatic diseases.
    Gao Y; Liu X; Zhang L; Xia T; Zhao D
    Z Rheumatol; 2017 Feb; 76(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 27878596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bibliometric analysis of literature on female genital mutilation: (1930 - 2015).
    Sweileh WM
    Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(1):130. PubMed ID: 27724920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact of the web and social networks on vaccination. New challenges and opportunities offered to fight against vaccine hesitancy.
    Stahl JP; Cohen R; Denis F; Gaudelus J; Martinot A; Lery T; Lepetit H
    Med Mal Infect; 2016 May; 46(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 26987960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Scientometric characterization of Medwave's scientific production 2010-2014.
    Gallardo Sánchez Y; Gallardo Arzuaga RL; Fonseca Arias M; Pérez Atencio ME
    Medwave; 2016 Sep; 16(8):e6538. PubMed ID: 27636986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Differences between h-index measures from different bibliographic sources and search engines.
    Barreto ML; Aragão E; Sousa LE; Santana TM; Barata RB
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Apr; 47(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24037349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Metrics of activity in social networks are correlated with traditional metrics of scientific impact in endocrinology journals.
    Muñoz-Velandia OM; Fernández-Ávila DG; Patino-Hernandez D; Gómez AM
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2019; 13(4):2437-2440. PubMed ID: 31405656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Half a century of computer methods and programs in biomedicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1970 to 2017.
    Shukla N; Merigó JM; Lammers T; Miranda L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jan; 183():105075. PubMed ID: 31526946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research.
    Büttner F; Ardern CL; Blazey P; Dastouri S; McKay HA; Moher D; Khan KM
    Br J Sports Med; 2021 Jun; 55(12):647-648. PubMed ID: 33361277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.