These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31901272)

  • 1. Meta-analysis: Fixed-effect model.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jan; 157(1):134-137. PubMed ID: 31901272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Demystifying fixed and random effects meta-analysis.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2014 May; 17(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 24692250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model.
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 25404668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis and evidence.
    Goodman SN
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 2666026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis: Random-effects model.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Feb; 157(2):280-282. PubMed ID: 32005481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis model.
    Karabatsos G; Talbott E; Walker SG
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 26035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Feb; 13(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 8202653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. HELOW: a program for testing extreme homogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Zintzaras E; Ioannidis JP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 25023534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical Models and Methods for Network Meta-Analysis.
    Madden LV; Piepho HP; Paul PA
    Phytopathology; 2016 Aug; 106(8):792-806. PubMed ID: 27111798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sparse meta-analysis with high-dimensional data.
    He Q; Zhang HH; Avery CL; Lin DY
    Biostatistics; 2016 Apr; 17(2):205-20. PubMed ID: 26395907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some recommended statistical analytic practices when reliability generalization studies are conducted.
    Sánchez-Meca J; López-López JA; López-Pina JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):402-25. PubMed ID: 23046285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".
    Olkin I
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):297-9; discussion 300-1. PubMed ID: 8048979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Higgins JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1158-60. PubMed ID: 18832388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of methods for fixed effects meta-analysis of individual patient data with time to event outcomes.
    Tudur Smith C; Williamson PR
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):621-30. PubMed ID: 18042571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On pooled and stratified analysis of epidemiologic rates.
    Nurminen M
    Public Health Rev; 1988; 16(3-4):163-87. PubMed ID: 3272013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The likelihood ratio versus the p value in meta-analysis: where is the evidence? Comment on the paper by S. N. Goodman.
    Zucker D; Yusuf S
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):205-8; discussion 209-10. PubMed ID: 2666027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.