These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31901272)

  • 21. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Heterogeneous views on heterogeneity.
    Patsopoulos NA; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1740-2. PubMed ID: 18940836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis: reconciling the results of independent studies.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1995 Mar 15-Apr 15; 14(5-7):457-72. PubMed ID: 7792440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Heterogeneity in meta-analyses. Comparing apples and oranges?
    Choi SW; Lam DM
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):532-534. PubMed ID: 28213890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Meta-analysis: different methods--different conclusions?
    Böckenhoff A; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():39-43. PubMed ID: 11187581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Concealed correlations meta-analysis: A new method for synthesizing standardized regression coefficients.
    Fernández-Castilla B; Aloe AM; Declercq L; Jamshidi L; Onghena P; Natasha Beretvas S; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):316-331. PubMed ID: 30251007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performing and evaluating meta-analyses.
    Burcharth J; Pommergaard HC; Rosenberg J
    Surgery; 2015 Feb; 157(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25304841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Knapp G; Biggerstaff BJ; Hartung J
    Biom J; 2006 Apr; 48(2):271-85. PubMed ID: 16708778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accounting for Missing Correlation Coefficients in Fixed-Effects MASEM.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 29220593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
    Mathew T; Nordström K
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis of environmental health data.
    Hasselblad V
    Sci Total Environ; 1995 Jan; 160-161():545-58. PubMed ID: 7892584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An exact test for meta-analysis with binary endpoints.
    Kuss O; Gromann C
    Methods Inf Med; 2007; 46(6):662-8. PubMed ID: 18066416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Synthesizer 1.0: a varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.
    Krizan Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 20805608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing.
    Polanin JR; Pigott TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26035470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: uses and pitfalls].
    Boissel JP
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):759-70. PubMed ID: 18225428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis in evidence-based healthcare: a paradigm shift away from random effects is overdue.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L; Thalib L; Barendregt JJ
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2017 Dec; 15(4):152-160. PubMed ID: 29135532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Missing predictors in models of effect size.
    Pigott TD
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Sep; 24(3):277-307. PubMed ID: 11523319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.