These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31902019)

  • 21. The effect of study modality on false recognition.
    Smith RE; Hunt RR; Gallagher MP
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Dec; 36(8):1439-49. PubMed ID: 19015503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB; Watson JM; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 16156175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. False recall and recognition of brand names increases over time.
    Sherman SM
    Memory; 2013; 21(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 22963741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eye-closure & the retrieval of item-specific information in recognition memory.
    Parker A; Dagnall N
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Jan; 77():102858. PubMed ID: 31837571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay.
    Knott L; Wilkinson S; Hellenthal M; Shah D; Howe ML
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Nov; 36(7):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 36196863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested.
    Dewhurst SA; Barry C; Swannell ER; Holmes SJ; Bathurst GL
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 17848024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A memory-interference versus the "dud"-effect account of a DRM false memory result: Fewer related targets at test, higher critical-lure false recognition.
    Jou J; Hwang M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 35318582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can false memories be corrected by feedback in the DRM paradigm?
    McConnell MD; Hunt RR
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 17910183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. False memories in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients: A preliminary investigation with the DRM paradigm.
    Pitteri M; Vannucci M; Ziccardi S; Beccherle M; Semenza C; Calabrese M
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2020 Jan; 37():101418. PubMed ID: 32172993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Exploring the consequences of nonbelieved memories in the DRM paradigm.
    Otgaar H; Moldoveanu G; Wang J; Howe ML
    Memory; 2017 Aug; 25(7):922-933. PubMed ID: 28029065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: a meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Fawcett JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):349-65. PubMed ID: 24853535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. False recognition occurs more frequently during source identification than during old-new recognition.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 11294439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.
    Roediger HL; Watson JM; McDermott KB; Gallo DA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):385-407. PubMed ID: 11700893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acts of generating and their sources: predicting the effects of imagery encoding on false recognition errors.
    Foley MA; Cowan E; Schlemmer E; Belser-Ehrlich J
    Memory; 2012; 20(4):384-99. PubMed ID: 22443412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. False recognition with the Deese-Roediger-McDermott-Reid-Solso procedure: a quantitative summary.
    McKelvie SJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 2):1387-408. PubMed ID: 15291231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Norms for emotion-false memory lists.
    Chang M; Brainerd CJ; Toglia MP; Schmidt SR
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):96-112. PubMed ID: 32572846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Blease K
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19031309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hypnotizability, not suggestion, influences false memory development.
    Dasse MN; Elkins GR; Weaver CA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2015; 63(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 25365130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.