208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31902201)
1. Noise-Induced Change of Cortical Temporal Processing in Cochlear Implant Users.
Han JH; Lee J; Lee HJ
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 13(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 31902201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
Blankenship CM; Meinzen-Derr J; Zhang F
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Varying effect of noise on sound onset and acoustic change evoked auditory cortical N1 responses evoked by a vowel-vowel stimulus.
Yaralı M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():36-43. PubMed ID: 32302643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Acoustic Change Complex Compared to Hearing Performance in Unilaterally and Bilaterally Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
van Heteren JAA; Vonck BMD; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Lammers MJW
Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1783-1799. PubMed ID: 35696186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
Martin BA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic Change Responses to Amplitude Modulation in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships to Speech Perception.
Han JH; Dimitrijevic A
Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():124. PubMed ID: 32132897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory cortical activity in normal hearing subjects to consonant vowels presented in quiet and in noise.
Dimitrijevic A; Pratt H; Starr A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jun; 124(6):1204-15. PubMed ID: 23276491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age effects on cognitive functions and speech-in-noise processing: An event-related potential study with cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Burkhardt P; Müller V; Meister H; Weglage A; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1005859. PubMed ID: 36620447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central auditory system responses from children while listening to speech in noise.
Benítez-Barrera CR; Key AP; Ricketts TA; Tharpe AM
Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108165. PubMed ID: 33485110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
Berger JI; Gander PE; Kim S; Schwalje AT; Woo J; Na YM; Holmes A; Hong JM; Dunn CC; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1107-1120. PubMed ID: 37144890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical potentials evoked by tone frequency changes can predict speech perception in noise.
Vonck BMD; van Heteren JAA; Lammers MJW; de Jel DVC; Schaake WAA; van Zanten GA; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H
Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108508. PubMed ID: 35477512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.
Xie Z; Stakhovskaya O; Goupell MJ; Anderson S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):719-740. PubMed ID: 34231111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
