These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31902201)

  • 21. Cortical Auditory Event-Related Potentials and Categorical Perception of Voice Onset Time in Children With an Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    McFayden TC; Baskin P; Stephens JDW; He S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():184. PubMed ID: 32523521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness.
    Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal encoding of the voice onset time phonetic parameter by field potentials recorded directly from human auditory cortex.
    Steinschneider M; Volkov IO; Noh MD; Garell PC; Howard MA
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Nov; 82(5):2346-57. PubMed ID: 10561410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.
    Papesh MA; Stefl AA; Gallun FJ; Billings CJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):106-121. PubMed ID: 32520849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
    Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C; Zhang F; Keith R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of spatial separation with better- ear listening on N1-P2 complex.
    Atılgan A; Çiprut A
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Dec; 48(6):1067-1073. PubMed ID: 33745789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults.
    Purdy SC; Kelly AS
    Semin Hear; 2016 Feb; 37(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 27587923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. N1-p2 recordings to gaps in broadband noise.
    Palmer SB; Musiek FE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 23231815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrically evoked auditory cortical responses elicited from individually fitted stimulation parameters in cochlear implant users.
    Callejón-Leblic MA; Barrios-Romero MM; Kontides A; Sánchez-Gómez S; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Jul; 62(7):650-658. PubMed ID: 35477333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Acoustic Change Complex in Response to Frequency Changes and Its Correlation to Cochlear Implant Speech Outcomes.
    McGuire K; Firestone GM; Zhang N; Zhang F
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2021; 15():757254. PubMed ID: 34744668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The temporal mismatch across listening sides affects cortical auditory evoked responses in normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant users with contralateral acoustic hearing.
    Dolhopiatenko H; Segovia-Martinez M; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 451():109088. PubMed ID: 39032483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of Simultaneous Contralateral White Noise Masking on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Elicited by Speech Stimuli.
    Felix LDA; Menezes PL; Oliveira LV; Batista CHA; Carnaúba ATL; Andrade KCL
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 28(1):e115-e121. PubMed ID: 38322432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of consonant-vowel transitions in speech stimuli on cortical auditory evoked potentials in adults.
    Doellinger M; Burger M; Hoppe U; Bosco E; Eysholdt U
    Open Neurol J; 2011; 5():37-45. PubMed ID: 21643536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.