153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31902570)
1. Clinical relevance of augmented statistical shape model of the scapula in the glenoid region.
Salhi A; Burdin V; Brochard S; Mutsvangwa TE; Borotikar B
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():88-94. PubMed ID: 31902570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical Shape Modeling Approach to Predict Missing Scapular Bone.
Salhi A; Burdin V; Boutillon A; Brochard S; Mutsvangwa T; Borotikar B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 48(1):367-379. PubMed ID: 31512013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of predisposing scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model-Part II: shoulder osteoarthritis.
Verhaegen F; Meynen A; Debeer P; Scheys L
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Sep; 30(9):e558-e571. PubMed ID: 33600897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual reconstruction of glenoid bone defects using a statistical shape model.
Plessers K; Vanden Berghe P; Van Dijck C; Wirix-Speetjens R; Debeer P; Jonkers I; Vander Sloten J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):160-166. PubMed ID: 29032987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A statistical shape model to predict the premorbid glenoid cavity.
Abler D; Berger S; Terrier A; Becce F; Farron A; Büchler P
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1800-1808. PubMed ID: 29958822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interactive patient-specific 3D approximation of scapula bone shape from 2D X-ray images using landmark-constrained statistical shape model fitting.
Mutsvangwa T; Wasswa W; Burdin V; Borotikar B; Douglas TS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():1816-1819. PubMed ID: 29060242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of the variability of scapular inclination and the glenoid version - considerations for preoperative planning: clinical-radiological study.
Fulin P; Kysilko M; Pokorny D; Padr R; Kasprikova N; Landor I; Sosna A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thinking outside the glenohumeral box: Hierarchical shape variation of the periarticular anatomy of the scapula using statistical shape modeling.
Jacxsens M; Elhabian SY; Brady SE; Chalmers PN; Mueller AM; Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Orthop Res; 2020 Oct; 38(10):2272-2279. PubMed ID: 31965594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder.
Maurer A; Fucentese SF; Pfirrmann CW; Wirth SH; Djahangiri A; Jost B; Gerber C
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Aug; 21(8):1096-103. PubMed ID: 22036540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of scapular morphology and bone quality with statistical models.
Burton WS; Sintini I; Chavarria JM; Brownhill JR; Laz PJ
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Mar; 22(4):341-351. PubMed ID: 30732468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is radiograph glenopolar angle accurate for extraarticular scapular neck fractures?
Kejriwal R; Ahuja T; Hong T
Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2772-2776. PubMed ID: 27717542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration of glenoid joint line: a three-dimensional analysis of scapular landmarks.
Gilliland L; Launay M; Salhi A; Green N; Maharaj J; Italia KR; Cutbush K; Gupta A
JSES Int; 2023 May; 7(3):478-484. PubMed ID: 37266165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Scapular Statistical Shape Model can Reliably Predict Premorbid Glenoid Morphology in Conditions of Severe Glenoid Bone Loss.
Fleet CT; Giraudon T; Walch G; Morvan Y; Urvoy M; Walch A; Werthel JD; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38762148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomical plane and transverse axis of the scapula: Reliability of manual positioning of the anatomical landmarks.
Jacquot A; Gauci MO; Urvoy M; de Casson FB; Berhouet J; Letissier H
Shoulder Elbow; 2022 Oct; 14(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 36199507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D image-based morphometric analysis of the scapular neck length in subjects undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Simon P; Diaz M; Cusick M; Santoni B; Frankle M
Clin Anat; 2018 Jan; 31(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 28514491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of a CT reconstruction for preoperative surgical planning in the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.
Hardy A; Loriaut P; Granger B; Neffati A; Massein A; Casabianca L; Pascal-Moussellard H; Gerometta A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jan; 26(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 27734111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thoughts on a new surgical assistance method for implanting the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: Statistical modeling of the native premorbid glenoid.
Berhouet J; Favard L; Boas D; Voisin T; Slimane M
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Apr; 105(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 30765310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates With Computed Tomography for Glenoid Version Calculation Despite Lack of Visibility of Medial Scapula.
Parada SA; Shaw KA; Antosh IJ; Eichinger JK; Li X; Curry EJ; Provencher MT
Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 31864608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphology of the scapula relative to the reverse shoulder prosthesis.
Torrens C; Corrales M; Gonzalez G; Solano A; Caceres E
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Aug; 17(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19721140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability in total shoulder arthroplasty planning software compared to a control CT-derived 3D printed scapula.
Shah SS; Sahota S; Denard PJ; Provencher MT; Parsons BO; Hartzler RU; Dines JS
Shoulder Elbow; 2021 Jun; 13(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 34659466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
