127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31903408)
1. Is there a safety-net effect with computer-aided detection?
Du-Crow E; Astley SM; Hulleman J
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Mar; 7(2):022405. PubMed ID: 31903408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography.
Taylor P; Champness J; Given-Wilson R; Johnston K; Potts H
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Feb; 9(6):iii, 1-58. PubMed ID: 15717938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When and why might a computer-aided detection (CAD) system interfere with visual search? An eye-tracking study.
Drew T; Cunningham C; Wolfe JM
Acad Radiol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1260-7. PubMed ID: 22958720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts.
Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes MB; Mann RM; Mus R; den Heeten GJ; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel RM; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 23091171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.
Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A study on two different CAD systems for mammography as an aid to radiological diagnosis in the search of microcalcification clusters.
Lauria A; Palmiero R; Forni G; Fantacci ME; Imbriaco M; Sodano A; Indovina PL
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 16036158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
Astley SM
Acad Radiol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1139-43. PubMed ID: 15530806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices.
Taylor P; Given-Wilson RM
Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 1():S26-30. PubMed ID: 15917442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer.
Chu WC; Lam WW; Pang AL; So NM; Tang AP; Tse GM; Ahuja AT
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15191097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.
Zheng B; Ganott MA; Britton CA; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 11719657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
