BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31903522)

  • 1. Review of Valuation Methods of Preference-Based Measures of Health for Economic Evaluation in Child and Adolescent Populations: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?
    Rowen D; Rivero-Arias O; Devlin N; Ratcliffe J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Apr; 38(4):325-340. PubMed ID: 31903522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.
    Chen G; Ratcliffe J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25985933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments.
    Kwon J; Smith S; Raghunandan R; Howell M; Huynh E; Kim S; Bentley T; Roberts N; Lancsar E; Howard K; Wong G; Craig J; Petrou S
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 Jul; 21(4):559-584. PubMed ID: 37133712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Think of the Children: A Discussion of the Rationale for and Implications of the Perspective Used for EQ-5D-Y Health State Valuation.
    Lipman SA; Reckers-Droog VT; Kreimeier S
    Value Health; 2021 Jul; 24(7):976-982. PubMed ID: 34243841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?
    Ungar WJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):641-52. PubMed ID: 21604821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children's Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review.
    Bailey C; Howell M; Raghunandan R; Salisbury A; Chen G; Coast J; Craig JC; Devlin NJ; Huynh E; Lancsar E; Mulhern BJ; Norman R; Petrou S; Ratcliffe J; Street DJ; Howard K; Viney R;
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Jul; 40(7):663-698. PubMed ID: 35619044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.
    Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding Canadian stakeholders' views on measuring and valuing health for children and adolescents: a qualitative study.
    Xie F; Xie S; Pullenayegum E; Ohinmaa A
    Qual Life Res; 2024 May; 33(5):1415-1422. PubMed ID: 38438665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set.
    Kreimeier S; Greiner W
    Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 30661631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values.
    Mukuria C; Rowen D; Harnan S; Rawdin A; Wong R; Ara R; Brazier J
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2019 Jun; 17(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 30945127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.
    Hettiarachchi R; Kularatna S; Byrnes J; Mulhern B; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e038626. PubMed ID: 33087374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring health-related quality of life for child maltreatment: a systematic literature review.
    Prosser LA; Corso PS
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Jul; 5():42. PubMed ID: 17634122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
    Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments.
    Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public.
    Powell PA; Rowen D; Rivero-Arias O; Tsuchiya A; Brazier JE
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Sep; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 34556133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preference-based measures to obtain health state utility values for use in economic evaluations with child-based populations: a review and UK-based focus group assessment of patient and parent choices.
    Wolstenholme JL; Bargo D; Wang K; Harnden A; Räisänen U; Abel L
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1769-1780. PubMed ID: 29564713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.