262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31904644)
21. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Delayed post mastectomy breast reconstructions with allogeneic acellular dermal matrix prepared by a new decellularizationmethod.
Bohac M; Varga I; Polak S; Dragunova J; Fedeles J; Koller J
Cell Tissue Bank; 2018 Mar; 19(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 28812172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):600-10. PubMed ID: 26438439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative Analysis of Sterile Freeze-Dried Versus Sterile Pre-Hydration Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Park KC; Park ES; Cha HG; Kim SY
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(5):1671-1677. PubMed ID: 33959782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inhibition Mechanism of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Capsule Formation in Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Postmastectomy Radiotherapy.
Kim IK; Park SO; Chang H; Jin US
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):2279-2287. PubMed ID: 29855829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pre-Pectoral One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Anterior Coverage Using Superior Anterior Biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and Inferior Anterior Dermal Sling Support.
Sisti A; Sadeghi P; Cuomo R; Alvarez SM
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jul; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 35893107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Difference in the outcomes of anterior tenting and wrapping techniques for acellular dermal matrix coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Sohn SM; Lee HC; Park SH; Yoon ES
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Oct; 85():266-275. PubMed ID: 37536194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.
Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Comparative Study of Wraparound versus Anterior Coverage Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Han WY; Han SJ; Eom JS; Kim EK; Han HH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Oct; 152(4):716-724. PubMed ID: 36862962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix Type in Treatment of Capsular Contracture in Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Samuels K; Millet E; Wong L
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Dec; 44(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 37595294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Evolving Role of Pre-pectoral ADM-assisted Approach in Implant-based Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy: An Overview of the Literature and Description of Technique.
Wazir U; Mokbel K
In Vivo; 2018; 32(6):1477-1480. PubMed ID: 30348704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Use of Meshed Dermal Autograft in Breast Reconstruction.
Zingaretti N; Guarneri GF; De Biasio F; Shoeib MA; Parodi PC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(6):1704-1706. PubMed ID: 29392359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience.
Salzberg CA; Ashikari AY; Berry C; Hunsicker LM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):329-337. PubMed ID: 27064232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction provides protection from postmastectomy radiation therapy: a clinicopathologic perspective.
Park TH; Chung SW; Song SY; Lew DH; Roh TS; Lee DW
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(3):27. PubMed ID: 29511877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction.
Forsberg CG; Kelly DA; Wood BC; Mastrangelo SL; DeFranzo AJ; Thompson JT; David LR; Marks MW
Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S116-20. PubMed ID: 24374398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Single-Unit technique for the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction.
Luan A; Patel AA; Martin SA; Nazerali RS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 May; 74(5):981-986. PubMed ID: 33248935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
