These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31904661)

  • 1. One-year outcomes of a suture-less laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy using polypropylene Y-mesh grafts and fibrin sealant spray: A prospective comparative study.
    Tsai CP; Kao HF; Liu CK; Shen PS; Chen MJ; Hung MJ
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2020 May; 83(5):484-490. PubMed ID: 31904661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
    Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Laparoscopic Y-shaped polypropylene mesh for uterine and vaginal vault prolapse].
    Li M; Feng Y; Jin S; Yu D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1106-9. PubMed ID: 24279025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal cystocele repair and hysteropexy in women with anterior and central compartment prolapse: efficacy and safety after 30 months of follow-up.
    Serati M; Braga A; Cantaluppi S; Caccia G; Ghezzi F; Sorice P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):831-836. PubMed ID: 29064031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
    Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors that affect outcomes of prolapse repair using single-incision vaginal mesh procedures.
    Hsieh HY; Tsai CP; Liu CK; Shen PS; Hung YC; Hung MJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):298-306. PubMed ID: 28431204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy].
    Carramão S; Auge AP; Pacetta AM; Duarte E; Ayrosa P; Lemos NL; Aoki T
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Feb; 36(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20076870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes.
    Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Aslan K; Uncu G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 32135244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
    Gutman RE
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.
    Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.