167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31904661)
1. One-year outcomes of a suture-less laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy using polypropylene Y-mesh grafts and fibrin sealant spray: A prospective comparative study.
Tsai CP; Kao HF; Liu CK; Shen PS; Chen MJ; Hung MJ
J Chin Med Assoc; 2020 May; 83(5):484-490. PubMed ID: 31904661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and total vaginal mesh procedure using lightweight polypropylene meshes for prolapse repair.
Liu CK; Tsai CP; Chou MM; Shen PS; Chen GD; Hung YC; Hung MJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):552-8. PubMed ID: 25510700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse.
Price N; Slack A; Jackson SR
BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 20002370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
Jan H; Ghai V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Laparoscopic Y-shaped polypropylene mesh for uterine and vaginal vault prolapse].
Li M; Feng Y; Jin S; Yu D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1106-9. PubMed ID: 24279025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
Hanes CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal cystocele repair and hysteropexy in women with anterior and central compartment prolapse: efficacy and safety after 30 months of follow-up.
Serati M; Braga A; Cantaluppi S; Caccia G; Ghezzi F; Sorice P
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):831-836. PubMed ID: 29064031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted suture versus mesh hysteropexy: a retrospective comparison.
Gopinath D; Yong C; Harding-Forrester S; McIntyre F; McKenzie D; Carey M
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 35881174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors that affect outcomes of prolapse repair using single-incision vaginal mesh procedures.
Hsieh HY; Tsai CP; Liu CK; Shen PS; Hung YC; Hung MJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):298-306. PubMed ID: 28431204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy].
Carramão S; Auge AP; Pacetta AM; Duarte E; Ayrosa P; Lemos NL; Aoki T
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2009 Feb; 36(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20076870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes.
Orhan A; Ozerkan K; Kasapoglu I; Ocakoglu G; Aslan K; Uncu G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1573-1580. PubMed ID: 32135244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
Gutman RE
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.
Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
