These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31905132)

  • 1. The Effect of Sub-Threshold Pre-Pulses on Neural Activation Depends on Electrode Configuration.
    Eickhoff S; Jarvis JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2020 Sep; 67(9):2552-2559. PubMed ID: 31905132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulse Shaping Strategies for Electroceuticals: A Comprehensive Survey of the Use of Interphase Gaps in Miniature Stimulation Systems.
    Eickhoff S; Jarvis JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 May; 68(5):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 33651679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sub-threshold depolarizing pre-pulses can enhance the efficiency of biphasic stimuli in transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
    Vargas Luna JL; Mayr W; Cortés-Ramirez JA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Dec; 56(12):2213-2219. PubMed ID: 29949020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of electrode configuration on threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Pfingst BE; Morris DJ; Miller AL
    Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):76-84. PubMed ID: 7559181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute thresholds.
    Smith DW; Finley CC; van den Honert C; Olszyk VB; Konrad KE
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 7737916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative efficacy of monopolar vs. bipolar electrodes in stimulation-produced analgesia.
    Thorn BE; Applegate L; Jones K
    Exp Brain Res; 1990; 79(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 2323373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrical stimulation of pulp nerves--comparison of monopolar and bipolar electrode coupling.
    Virtanen ASJ
    Pain; 1985 Nov; 23(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 4069725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
    Mens LH; Berenstein CK
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Snyder RL; Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 15492888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory brainstem implant: electrophysiologic responses and subject perception.
    Herrmann BS; Brown MC; Eddington DK; Hancock KE; Lee DJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 25437141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
    Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.
    Chatterjee M; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 16270234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Nourski KV; Hu N; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):200-14. PubMed ID: 12527139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing Stimulation Strategies for Retinal Electrical Stimulation: a Modelling Study.
    Alqahtani A; Al Abed A; Lovell NH; Dokos S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2872-2875. PubMed ID: 31946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.