These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31905132)

  • 21. Optimizing Stimulation Strategies for Retinal Electrical Stimulation: a Modelling Study.
    Alqahtani A; Al Abed A; Lovell NH; Dokos S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2872-2875. PubMed ID: 31946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; de Balthasar C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2049-57. PubMed ID: 14587604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants.
    Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Nov; 1(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 11545227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Pfingst BE; Franck KH; Xu L; Bauer EM; Zwolan TA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA; Woodruff KE; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats.
    Smith DW; Finley CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2228-37. PubMed ID: 9348680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea.
    Frijns JH; de Snoo SL; ten Kate JH
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 95(1-2):33-48. PubMed ID: 8793506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cathodic- and anodic-pulses can alternately activate different sub-populations of neurons during sustained high-frequency stimulation of axons in rat hippocampus.
    Feng Z; Zheng L; Yuan Y; Yang G; Hu Y; Lu C; Wang Z
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35114653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Physiological Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.
    Spitzer ER; Hughes ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):786-798. PubMed ID: 28972468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
    Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.
    Cao P; Sun J; Yan Y; Chen Y; Chai X; Sun X; Ren Q; Li L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 253(12):2171-80. PubMed ID: 26228440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
    Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants.
    Drennan WR; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15811709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: direct current measurement in vivo.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Seligman PM; Tabor B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Apr; 46(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 10217884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants.
    Miller AL; Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):21-33. PubMed ID: 9259233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.