These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31905502)
1. Psychoacoustic Aspects of Speech Pattern Coding for the Deaf. Faulkner A; Fourcin AJ; Moore BCJ Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):172-180. PubMed ID: 31905502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychoacoustic aspects of speech pattern coding for the deaf. Faulkner A; Fourcin AJ; Moore BC Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():172-80. PubMed ID: 2356724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities. Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf. Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Testing and re-education of candidates for the SIVO prosthesis]. Elbaz P; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Legendre AL Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988; 105(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 2470311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of performance of a peripheral vision lipreading aid. Kunov H; Ebrahimi D Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 1842278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):310-35. PubMed ID: 15292774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tactual display of consonant voicing as a supplement to lipreading. Yuan H; Reed CM; Durlach NI J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1003-15. PubMed ID: 16158656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception studies using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor, residual hearing, and lipreading. Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2593-607. PubMed ID: 2526169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multisensory narrative tracking by a profoundly deaf subject using an electrocutaneous vocoder and a vibrotactile aid. Lynch MP; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Urbano RC; Pero PJ J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 2739385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of high frequency impaired listeners with conventional and extended high frequency amplification. Schwartz DM; Surr RK; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE Audiology; 1979; 18(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 435176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical results with a hearing aid and a single-channel vibrotactile device for profoundly deaf adults. Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Brown AM; Clark GM Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 4063556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosodic and segmental aspects of speech perception with the House/3M single-channel implant. Rosen S; Walliker J; Brimacombe JA; Edgerton BJ J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 2704206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrical stimulation at the wrist as an aid for the profoundly deaf. Dodgson GS; Brown BH; Freeston IL; Stevens JC Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1983 Nov; 4(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 6228371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading. Rosen SM; Fourcin AJ; Moore BC Nature; 1981 May; 291(5811):150-2. PubMed ID: 7231534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults. Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):336-60. PubMed ID: 15292775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of a preliminary clinical trial on a multiple channel cochlear prosthesis. Dowell RC; Martin LF; Clark GM; Brown AM Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 3160295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]