These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31905530)

  • 1. Wearable Digital Speech Processor for Cochlear Implants Using a TMS320C25.
    Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):120-127. PubMed ID: 31905530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wearable digital speech processor for cochlear implants using a TMS320C25.
    Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():120-7. PubMed ID: 2356719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech encoding strategies for multielectrode cochlear implants: a digital signal processor approach.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Prog Brain Res; 1993; 97():301-11. PubMed ID: 8234756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital speech processing for cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 1475099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ultra-low-power programmable analog bionic ear processor.
    Sarpeshkar R; Salthouse C; Sit JJ; Baker MW; Zhak SM; Lu TK; Turicchia L; Balster S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Apr; 52(4):711-27. PubMed ID: 15825873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants: variations of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy.
    McKay CM; Vandali AE; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Jan; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 8128854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
    Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Algorithms, hardware, and software for a digital signal processor microcomputer-based speech processor in a multielectrode cochlear implant system.
    Morris LR; Barszczewski P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1989 Jun; 36(6):573-84. PubMed ID: 2731944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How does a cochlear implant speech processor work?].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Nov; 84(11):841-50; quiz 851-4. PubMed ID: 16358193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Marsh M; Schafer E; Lianos L; Gilden J; O'Neill L; Arkis P; Menapace C; Nel E; Jones M
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1181-90. PubMed ID: 26049314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech processing studies using an acoustic model of a multiple-channel cochlear implant.
    Blamey PJ; Dowell RC; Tong YC; Brown AM; Luscombe SM; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 6547734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The bionic ear: principles and current status of cochlear prostheses.
    Parkins CW
    Neurosurgery; 1985 Jun; 16(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 3839294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
    Mens LH; Berenstein CK
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.