These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31905533)

  • 1. Real-Time Signal Processing in Speech Recognition and Its Potential Use within The Development of Hearing Aids.
    Dalsgaard P; Fink FK; Pedersen JE; Sørensen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):108-116. PubMed ID: 31905533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time signal processing in speech recognition and its potential use within the development of hearing aids.
    Dalsgaard P; Fink FK; Pedersen JE; Sørensen H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():108-16. PubMed ID: 2356718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY; Stickney GS; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1351-61. PubMed ID: 15807023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
    Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some effects of acoustic attributes of speech on the processing of phonetic feature information.
    Soli SD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 6449534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.
    Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.
    Souza PE; Tremblay KL
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Sep; 10(3):119-43. PubMed ID: 16959734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
    Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Dooley GJ; Blamey PJ; Seligman PM
    Audiology; 1994; 33(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8129677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical design and evaluation of the prototype of a new digital audioprosthesis for profound hearing loss: speech recognition aspects.
    Urquiza R; Ruiz-Rico R; Tejero C; Gago A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 10325552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 58(4):1363-76. PubMed ID: 26090648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.