These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3190564)

  • 1. 40-Hz auditory event-related potential in normal adults.
    Fu BT; Jiang SC; Gu R; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M; Paludetti G
    Audiology; 1988; 27(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 3190564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Middle-latency auditory components in response to clicks and low- and middle-frequency tone pips (0.5-1 kHz).
    Maurizi M; Ottaviani F; Paludetti G; Rosignoli M; Almadori G; Tassoni A
    Audiology; 1984; 23(6):569-80. PubMed ID: 6517749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
    Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cognitive and visual functions in a sample of the aged population: analysis of evoked potentials].
    Jech R; Růzicka E
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1995 Dec; 134(24):791-7. PubMed ID: 8599823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparisons among three frequency-specific auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing adults].
    Chen F; Fan LH; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Dong DA
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 28(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 22619803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults.
    Harris KC; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):58-68. PubMed ID: 17344001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects.
    Vesco KK; Bone RC; Ryan JC; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 7688285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-intensity trading in the late auditory evoked potential.
    Eddins AC; Peterson JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):516-25. PubMed ID: 10391619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency and age-dependent auditory evoked potential thresholds in infants.
    Klein AJ
    Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 16(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 6401088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Characterization of cortical auditory evoked potential (P1-N1-P2) in normal hearing young adults].
    Li YL; Liu XH; Fu XX; Qi BE
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 31(4):262-266. PubMed ID: 29871239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects.
    Sugg MJ; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Nov; 41(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 8608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of complex tonal stimuli on latency and amplitude of a late auditory evoked potential.
    Marx CG; Goshorn EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2320. PubMed ID: 27250127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Steady state auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing subjects: evaluation of threshold and testing time.
    Picciotti PM; Giannantonio S; Paludetti G; Conti G
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(6):310-4. PubMed ID: 23258317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. P3 from auditory stimuli in healthy elderly subjects: hearing threshold and tone stimulus frequency.
    Pollock VE; Schneider LS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 May; 12(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 1639670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of rise-fall time, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response.
    Beattie RC; Moretti M; Warren V
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):114-27. PubMed ID: 6716983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].
    Schönweiler R; Neumann A; Ptok M
    HNO; 2005 Nov; 53(11):983-94. PubMed ID: 16283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.