These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3190565)

  • 21. Short-latency auditory responses obtained by cross correlation.
    Dobie RA; Wilson MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1411-21. PubMed ID: 6512103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Wegner O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frequency-specific contributions to the auditory brain stem response derived by means of pure-tone masking.
    Pantev C; Lagidze S; Pantev M; Kevanishvili Z
    Audiology; 1985; 24(4):275-87. PubMed ID: 4051877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of noise masking on the brain-stem and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: central and peripheral components.
    Gott PS; Hughes EC
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 74(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 2465888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study.
    Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 496720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brain-stem auditory-evoked responses elicited by maximum length sequences: effect of simultaneous masking noise.
    Burkard R; Shi Y; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1665-72. PubMed ID: 2341670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking.
    Don M; Eggermont JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1084-92. PubMed ID: 649867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies.
    Don M; Ponton CW; Eggermont JJ; Kwong B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2280-9. PubMed ID: 10491692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of click-evoked brainstem auditory electric potentials using high-pass noise masking and its clinical application.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():471-86. PubMed ID: 6284001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Human brain-stem auditory evoked responses obtained by cross correlation to trains of clicks, noise bursts, and tone bursts.
    Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1398-404. PubMed ID: 1939904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory brainstem responses from human adults and infants: influence of stimulus onset.
    Folsom RC; Aurich CD
    Audiology; 1987; 26(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3606471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Auditory potentials of the brain stem masked by continuous wide-band noise].
    Prosser S; Arslan E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1983; 3(6):679-86. PubMed ID: 6675418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1204-13. PubMed ID: 6643843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 3571722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 7462466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Masking effects on ABR waves I and V in infants and adults.
    Klein AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):755-9. PubMed ID: 3958315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.