These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3190565)

  • 41. Use of contralateral masking in the measurement of the auditory brainstem response.
    Humes LE; Ochs MG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 7162153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Auditory brainstem, middle and late latency responses to short gaps in noise at different presentation rates.
    Alhussaini K; Bohorquez J; Delgado RE; Ozdamar O
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 29378459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Evaluation of binaural interaction by the characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials in guinea pigs].
    Chudnovskiĭ SI; Moroz BS; Poliakov AN
    Neirofiziologiia; 1987; 19(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 3447058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Frequency specificity of human auditory brainstem responses as revealed by pure-tone masking profiles.
    Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):919-24. PubMed ID: 6707321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Noise masking of tone responses and critical ratios in single units of the mouse cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus.
    Ehret G; Moffat AJ
    Hear Res; 1984 Apr; 14(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 6746421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
    Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of frequency-following potentials in man: masking and clinical studies.
    Moushegian G; Rupert AL; Stillman RD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1978 Dec; 45(6):711-18. PubMed ID: 84739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Response enhancement and reduction of the auditory brain-stem response in a forward-masking paradigm.
    Ananthanarayan AK; Gerken GM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 2435523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans.
    van den Honert C; Stypulkowski PH
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 3754550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking.
    Oates PA; Purdy SC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sound-evoked neurogenic responses with short latency of vestibular origin.
    Murofushi T; Iwasaki S; Takai Y; Takegoshi H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Feb; 116(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 15661118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Hear Res; 1987; 25(2-3):193-204. PubMed ID: 3558128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges.
    Kodera K; Hink RF; Yamada O; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 496722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Stimulus duration and waves of auditory brainstem response.
    Funasaka S; Ito S
    Audiology; 1986; 25(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3753306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of the intensity of masking noise on ear canal recorded low-frequency cochlear microphonic waveforms in normal hearing subjects.
    Zhang M
    Hear Res; 2014 Jul; 313():9-17. PubMed ID: 24793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of contralateral and ipsilateral masking of acoustic stimulation on the latencies of auditory evoked potentials from cochlea and brain stem.
    Boezeman EH; Kapteyn TS; Visser SL; Snel AM
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1983 Jun; 55(6):710-3. PubMed ID: 6189701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Rise-fall time effects on the brainstem auditory evoked response: mechanisms.
    Hecox K; Deegan D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2109-16. PubMed ID: 6875096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
    Dum N; von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Auditory brain stem response in newborn infants--masking effect on ipsi- and contralateral recording.
    Hatanaka T; Yasuhara A; Hori A; Kobayashi Y
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 2358135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.